Do disease status and race affect the efficacy of zoledronic acid in patients with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials
机构:[1]Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.广东省中医院[2]Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.[3]Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.[4]Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.中山大学附属第二医院
Zoledronic acid (ZA) does not improve the overall survival (OS) of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); however, little is known about the efficacy of ZA in to hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC), metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), and non- metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Therefore, we assessed the efficacy of ZA in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and different disease statuses.Fifteen eligible randomized-control trials (RCTs) with ZA intervention, including 8280 participants with HSPC, mHSPC, nmCRPC, and mCRPC, were analyzed. The primary and secondary outcome were overall survival(OS), and skeletal-related events (SREs), and bone mineral density (BMD).The participants included 8280 men (7856 non-Asian and 424 Asian). Seven trials yielded a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 0.95 (0.88, 1.03; P = 0.19) for OS. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant improvement in OS in the HSPC, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), M0 and M1(bone metastasis) groups, with pooled HR (95%CI) of 0.96 (0.88,1.05), 0.78 (0.46,1.33), 0.95 (0.81,1.13), 0.85 (0.69,1.04) respectively. The Asian group exhibited improved in OS with an HR of 0.67 (0.48, 0.95; P = 0.02), whereas the non-Asian group showed no improvement in OS with an HR of 0.97 (0.90, 1.06; P = 0.52). Five trials yielded pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.65 (0.45, 0.95; P = 0.02) for SREs. In the subgroup, SREs were significantly decreased in the M1 and Asian groups with ORs of 0.65 (0.45, 0.95; P = 0.02) and 0.42 (0.24, 0.71; P = 0.001), respectively. Six trials yielded a pooled mean difference (MD) of 8.08 (5.79, 10.37; P < 0.001) for BMD. In the HSPC we observed a stable improvement in increased BMD percentage with an MD (95%CI) of 6.65 (5.67, 7.62) (P = 0.001).ZA intervention does not significantly improve OS in patients with prostate cancer (HSPC, CRPC, M0, M1) but probably improves OS in the Asian populations. M1 and Asian groups had exhibit a significant reduction in SREs regardless of the HSPC or CRPC status after ZA administration. Moreover, ZA treatment increases BMD percentage.
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Chen Chiwei,Lin Mandi,Yu Daocheng,et al.Do disease status and race affect the efficacy of zoledronic acid in patients with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials[J].PLOS ONE.2022,17(9):doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275176.
APA:
Chen Chiwei,Lin Mandi,Yu Daocheng,Qin Weiting,Zhou Jianfu...&Xiang Songtao.(2022).Do disease status and race affect the efficacy of zoledronic acid in patients with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.PLOS ONE,17,(9)
MLA:
Chen Chiwei,et al."Do disease status and race affect the efficacy of zoledronic acid in patients with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials".PLOS ONE 17..9(2022)