高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with malignant melanoma: a systematic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and non-comparative clinical studies

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangdong Key Lab Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diag &, Canc Ctr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China [2]Sun Yat Sat Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Dept Pharm, Zhuhai, Peoples R China [3]Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Sch Tradit Chinese Med, Beijing, Peoples R China [4]Shandong Univ, Sch Stomatol, Jinan, Peoples R China [5]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Guangzhou, Peoples R China [6]Harbin Med Univ, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Harbin, Peoples R China [7]Peking Univ, Med Equipment Dept, Hosp 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: melanoma bevacizumab angiogenesis inhibitors meta-analysis systematic review

摘要:
Background: Malignant melanoma is a highly aggressive cancer that spreads and metastasizes quickly. In recent years, the antiangiogenic drug bevacizumab has been trialed to treat malignant melanoma. We conducted the first meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with other drugs in malignant melanoma.Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-comparative clinical studies of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy, targeted medicine, and interferon to treat malignant melanoma in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Meta-analysis of RCT was performed using Review Manager (version 5.4), and non-comparative meta-analysis was performed using R (version 4.0.3). The primary outcome was the objective response rate. Depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies, the pooled outcomes and 95% CI were calculated using either random-effects or fixed-effect models. Subgroup outcomes were calculated with possible relevant variables. Sensitivity analyses were carried out by excluding each study from the highly heterogeneous pooled results in turn. Funnel plot and Begg's test were used to test the included studies' potential publication bias. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.Results: This meta-analysis included 20 trials: five RCTs and 15 non-comparative clinical studies with a total of 23 bevacizumab intervention arms. In 14 treatment arms, bevacizumab was combined with chemotherapy drugs such as fotemustine, dacarbazine, carboplatin/paclitaxel, and temozolomide. In six treatment arms, bevacizumab was combined with targeted medicines such as imatinib, everolimus, sorafenib, erlotinib, and temsirolimus. There were also six treatment arms that used bevacizumab in combination with interferon. The pooled objective response rate was 15.8% (95% CI, 11.4%-20.2%). Bevacizumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel significantly increased the overall survival compared to carboplatin/paclitaxel (HR = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.49-0.85, p < 0.01). Fatigue, nausea, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were the most common adverse events. The pooled incidence of hypertension of all bevacizumab arms in malignant melanoma was 32.4% (95% CI, 24.5%-40.3%).Conclusion: This study showed that bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy might be effective and well-tolerated in patients with stage III or IV unresectable malignant melanoma.

语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 药学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 药学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangdong Key Lab Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diag &, Canc Ctr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China [2]Sun Yat Sat Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Dept Pharm, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号