Comparison of kidney-tonifying and blood-activating medicinal herbs vs NSAIDs in patients with knee osteoarthritis A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
机构:[1]Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, China广东省中医院[2]Department of Orthopaedics, Foshan Second People’s Hospital, China[3]Department of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, China大德路总院骨科广东省中医院[4]Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, GuangDong Women and Children Hospital, China.
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most common chronic muscular diseases in old people. In recent years. ' people are more and more interested in the use of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) in the treatment of KOA, such as kidney-tonifying and blood-activating medicinal herbs (KTBAMs) in the treatment of KOA. Many studies have confirmed that KTBAMs are effective in the treatment of KOA. However, it is still unknown whether KTBAMs and NSAIDs are more effective in the treatment of KOA. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of KTBAMs and NSAIDs in the treatment of KOA. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from online databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, Wanfang Data. and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database that compared the efficacy of KTBAMs and NSAIDs in the treatment of KOA were retrieved. The main outcomes included the evaluation of functional outcomes, pain and adverse effects. The Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool was used to assess methodological quality. Results: The literature will provide a high-quality analysis of the current evidence supporting KTBAMs for KOA based on various comprehensive assessments including the total effective rate, visual analog scale scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequence scores, Knee Society Scale (KSS) scores, and adverse effects. Conclusion: This proposed systematic review will provide up-to-date evidence to assess the effect of KTBAMs in the treatment for patients with KOA.
基金:
National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China [81873314, 81974574]; China Postdoctoral Science FoundationChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M633036]; Medical Science Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [B2019091]; Project of Guangdong Provincial Department of Finance [[2014]157, [2018]8]; Key scientific research platforms and research projects of universities in Guangdong Province [2018KQNCX041]; Science and Technology Research Project of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine [YN2019ML08, YK2013B2N19, YN2015MS15]
第一作者机构:[1]Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[4]Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, GuangDong Women and Children Hospital, China.[*1]Department of Orthopaedics, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, GuangDong Women and Children Hospital, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Huang Hetao,Huang Sicong,Liang Guihong,et al.Comparison of kidney-tonifying and blood-activating medicinal herbs vs NSAIDs in patients with knee osteoarthritis A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].MEDICINE.2020,99(9):doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000019370.
APA:
Huang, Hetao,Huang, Sicong,Liang, Guihong,Zeng, Lingfeng,Pan, Jianke...&Pan, Biqi.(2020).Comparison of kidney-tonifying and blood-activating medicinal herbs vs NSAIDs in patients with knee osteoarthritis A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.MEDICINE,99,(9)
MLA:
Huang, Hetao,et al."Comparison of kidney-tonifying and blood-activating medicinal herbs vs NSAIDs in patients with knee osteoarthritis A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis".MEDICINE 99..9(2020)