高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Qinwen Baidu decoction for sepsis A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [a]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Shenzhen Hospital, [b]The Second Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: protocol Qingwen Baidu decoction sepsis systematic review

摘要:
Background: Sepsis is the most common critical illness in the clinic, with a high incidence and mortality. Qingwen Baidu decoction (QWBDD) has been widely applied in the treatment of sepsis, however, there is no systematic review or meta-analysis of QWBDD in the treatment of sepsis. Hence, we provide a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QWBDD in the treatment of sepsis. Methods: The databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Clinical Trial Database, World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registration Platform, CNKI, CBM, VIP, and WanFang Database will be searched from the time when the respective databases were established to January 2019. All randomized controlled trials (RTCs) published in Chinese and English assessing QWBDD for sepsis will be included. Continuity data are expressed as mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD), and dichotomous data is expressed as relative risk. Analyses will be performed by using RevMan V. 5.3.5 software. Results: This study will provide high-quality synthesis of current evidence of QWBDD in the treatment of sepsis from the following aspects, including 28-day mortality, mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood lactate, procalcitonin (PCT), tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), interleukin-6 (IL-6), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), acute physiology and chronic health score (APACHE-II), intensive care unit stay, mean hospital stay, mechanical ventilation time, etc. Conclusion: Our systematic review will provide evidence for judging whether QWBDD is an effective intervention for sepsis.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2017版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2016版] 出版后一年[2018版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [a]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Shenzhen Hospital,
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [a]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Shenzhen Hospital, [*1]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Shenzhen Hospital No. 1 Dayun Road, Sports New City, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, 518172, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号