机构:[1]Division of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China中山大学附属第一医院[2]Division of Gastroenterology, The Eighth Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, PR China[3]Division of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Bao'an District Songgang People's Hospital, Shenzhen, PR China深圳市宝安区人民医院深圳医学信息中心[4]Division of Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China深圳市中医院深圳医学信息中心[5]Division of Gastroenterology, The Second People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, PR China[6]Division of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China广东省中医院[7]Division of Gastroenterology, The First People’s Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, PR China
Background and study aims For bowel preparation, using a reduced volume of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution without influencing its effectiveness would be preferable. While simethicone shows great potential as an adjunctive agent, data on its use are limited. We aimed to clarify whether simethicone added to low-volume PEG solution improved bowel cleansing. Patients and methods Consecutive adult patients registered for colonoscopy were recruited from seven medical centers in South China between 15 April and 15 July 2015 and prospectively randomized into two groups: 2 L PEG (conventional group) and 2 L PEG plus simethicone (simethicone group). The primary endpoint was the effectiveness of bowel cleansing according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary endpoints included cecal intubation time, adenoma detection rate (ADR), patient safety and compliance, and adverse events. Results We included 290 and 289 patients in the conventional and simethicone groups, respectively, for analysis. The proportion with acceptable bowel cleansing (BBPS >= 6) was significantly higher in the simethicone group than in the conventional group (88.2% vs. 76.6%; P < 0.001). The mean (SD) BBPS score was significantly lower in the conventional group (6.5 [1.8] vs. 7.3 [1.7]; P < 0.001), as was the bubble score (2.5 [0.7] vs. 2.8 [0.5]; P < 0.001). The average cecal intubation time was significantly shorter in the simethicone group (6.3 [3.1] vs. 7.5 [5.1] minutes; P < 0.001). The ADR in the right colon was higher in the simethicone group than in the conventional group (16.6% vs. 10.3%; P = 0.03). Safety and compliance, including the taste, smell, and dosage of PEG, were similar for both groups. Conclusions Simethicone added to low-volume PEG solution improves bowel-cleansing efficacy, with similar safety and compliance, shorter cecal intubation time, and higher ADR.
基金:
This project was supported by grants from the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (#81670498), the Pearl River
S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou (#201610010126), Guangdong
Science and Technology (#2014A020212128,
#2016A020214006), Science and technology innovation young
talents of Guangdong special support plan (2016TQ03R296),
the Fundamental Research Funds for Sun Yat-sen University
(#15ykpy12), and Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished
Young Scholar (2017A030306021).
第一作者机构:[1]Division of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Division of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China[*1]Division of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, PR China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Shenghong Zhang,Danping Zheng,Jinping Wang,et al.Simethicone improves bowel cleansing with low-volume polyethylene glycol: a multicenter randomized trial[J].ENDOSCOPY.2018,50(4):412-422.doi:10.1055/s-0043-121337.
APA:
Shenghong Zhang,Danping Zheng,Jinping Wang,Jianwei Wu,Pingguang Lei...&Minhu Chen.(2018).Simethicone improves bowel cleansing with low-volume polyethylene glycol: a multicenter randomized trial.ENDOSCOPY,50,(4)
MLA:
Shenghong Zhang,et al."Simethicone improves bowel cleansing with low-volume polyethylene glycol: a multicenter randomized trial".ENDOSCOPY 50..4(2018):412-422