Measurement of Unconjugated Estriol in Serum by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of the Accuracy of Chemiluminescent Immunoassays
机构:[1]Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of GuangzhouUniversity of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China[2]Wadsworth Center,New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY[3]School of Public Healthand, University at Albany, State University of NewYork, Albany, NY[4]Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, ColumbiaUniversity Medical Center, New York, NY[5]Department of Pathology andLaboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center Hospital and College, Albany, NY[6]Reference Laboratory, Beijing Aerospace General Hospital, Beijing, China[7]College of Arts and Sciences, University at Albany, State University of NewYork, Albany, NY
BACKGROUND: Unconjugated estriol (uE(3)) is routinely analyzed in clinical laboratories as risk assessment for Down syndrome. Immunoassays of various types are the most commonly used methods. The accuracies of RIAs and ELISAs for uE(3) have been questioned, and to date there have been no independent studies investigating the accuracy of the relatively new chemiluminescent immunoassays. We developed and validated a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for uE(3) measurements in serum. METHODS: Serum samples from patients in the second trimester of pregnancy were used, and uE(3) concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS and the Beckman Coulter Access((R)) 2 and Siemens IMMULITE 2000 automatic chemiluminescent immunoassay analyzers. RESULTS: The LC-MS/MS method was validated and showed limit of detection 0.05 ng/mL; limit of quantification 0.2 ng/mL; linearity of response to 32 ng/mL; total imprecision of 16.2%, 10.4%, and 8.2% for uE(3) at 1.10, 4.18, and 8.32 ng/mL, respectively; and analytical recoveries of 95.9%-104.2%. ANOVA of the correlation for LC-MS/MS results vs chemiluminescent immunoassays results showed R-2 = 0.9678 (Access 2 = 0.9305 LC-MS/MS + 0.2177, S-y|x = 0.1786, P < 0.0001), and R-2 = 0.9663 (IMMULITE 2000 = 0.8849 LC-MS/MS -0.0403, S-y|x = 0.1738, P < 0.0001). Bland-Altman plots of uE(3) results revealed concentration-dependent immunoassay biases. Mock risk analysis for Down syndrome showed no apparent difference in the risk assessment outcomes if the adjusted method-specific multiples of the median were used, and the assay imprecision was < 10% CV. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of immunoassay methods for uE(3) analysis is needed to improve the accuracy of the measurements. (C) 2013 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of GuangzhouUniversity of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[2]Wadsworth Center,New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY[7]College of Arts and Sciences, University at Albany, State University of NewYork, Albany, NY[*1]Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201-0509.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Huang Xianzhang,Spink David C.,Schneider Erasmus,et al.Measurement of Unconjugated Estriol in Serum by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of the Accuracy of Chemiluminescent Immunoassays[J].CLINICAL CHEMISTRY.2014,60(1):260-268.doi:10.1373/clinchem.2013.212126.
APA:
Huang, Xianzhang,Spink, David C.,Schneider, Erasmus,Ling, Helen,Rai, Alex J....&Cao, Zhimin (Tim).(2014).Measurement of Unconjugated Estriol in Serum by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of the Accuracy of Chemiluminescent Immunoassays.CLINICAL CHEMISTRY,60,(1)
MLA:
Huang, Xianzhang,et al."Measurement of Unconjugated Estriol in Serum by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of the Accuracy of Chemiluminescent Immunoassays".CLINICAL CHEMISTRY 60..1(2014):260-268