高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Plant extracts for the topical management of psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]School of Health Sciences, and Traditional and Complementary Medicine Research Program, Health Innovations Research Institute, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia [2]Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Patients with psoriasis frequently use preparations of plant extracts. Physicians need to be aware of the current evidence concerning these products. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of preparations of plant extracts used topically for psoriasis. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, two Chinese databases and article reference lists. Randomized controlled trials investigating extracts of single plants were included. Preparations of multiple plants and combinations of plant extracts plus conventional therapies were excluded. Two authors conducted searches, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Outcomes used in meta-analyses were: clinical efficacy, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score, and quality of life and symptom scores. The 12 included studies investigated extracts of: Mahonia aquifolium (n=5), Aloe vera (n=3), indigo naturalis (n=2), kukui nut oil (n=1) and Camptotheca acuminata nut (n=1). Methodological quality was variable. Six studies provided data suitable for meta-analysis of clinical efficacy, and five were vs. placebo (relative risk 3<bold>37</bold>, 95% confidence interval 1<bold>36</bold>-8<bold>33</bold>). Experimental studies indicate components of indigo naturalis, Mahonia and Camptotheca have anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative and other actions of relevance to psoriasis. The clinical trial evidence provides limited support for preparations containing extracts of M. aquifolium, indigo naturalis and Aloe vera for the topical management of plaque psoriasis based on multiple studies. No serious adverse events were reported. Because of the small size of most studies and methodological weaknesses, strong conclusions cannot be made. The magnitudes of any effects cannot be measured with accuracy, so it is difficult to assess the clinical relevance of these preparations.

基金:

基金编号: APA

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2012]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 皮肤病学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 皮肤病学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2011]版:
Q1 DERMATOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 DERMATOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2011版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2010版] 出版后一年[2012版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]School of Health Sciences, and Traditional and Complementary Medicine Research Program, Health Innovations Research Institute, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]School of Health Sciences, and Traditional and Complementary Medicine Research Program, Health Innovations Research Institute, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia [2]Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号