高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on acupuncture for post-stroke aphasia

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [a]The Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China [b]Department of Neurology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China [c]School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, No. 1838, Guangzhou Avenue North, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Acupuncture AMSTAR-2 GRADE Overview Post-stroke aphasia Systematic review

摘要:
Introduction: Because current evidence regarding the effectiveness of acupuncture for post-stroke aphasia (PSA) is controversial, we comprehensively evaluated the methodological quality and evidence quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on acupuncture for PSA. Methods: SRs/MAs on acupuncture treatment for PSA were searched in eight databases. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessments were used to ascertain the methodological quality and evidence quality, respectively. Results: Six SRs/MAs on acupuncture treatment for PSA were included. The evaluation results of AMSTAR-2 showed that the methodological quality of all of the included SRs/MAs was rated as critically low. For GRADE, 14 (14/32, 43.75%) outcomes were rated as very low-quality evidence, 12 (14/32, 37.5%) as low-quality evidence, 6 (6/32,18.75%) as moderate-quality evidence, and 0 as high-quality evidence. Descriptive analysis results showed that acupuncture combined with speech and language therapy (SLT) appears, to some extent, to improve clinical effectiveness for the treatment of PSA, compared with SLT alone. Conclusions: Compared with SLT alone, acupuncture combined with SLT for the treatment of PSA may improve clinical effectiveness, but this conclusion must be considered cautiously due to the generally low methodological quality and evidence quality in the included SRs/MAs. © 2020

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 全科医学与补充医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 全科医学与补充医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
最新[2023]版:
Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [a]The Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号