机构:[a]Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Baiyun District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China.[b]Department of Orthopedics, Guangdong Province Integrative Medicine Orthopaedic Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Liwan District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China.
Short-stem (SS) prostheses require less resection of the femoral neck, produce a more physiological load pattern in the proximal femur, reduce stress shielding, and aid bone conservation and are, therefore, beneficial for young patients. Conventional cementless implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have shown excellent clinical results; however, it is unclear whether SS prostheses can obtain the same clinical and radiological outcomes. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate whether SS prostheses are superior to conventional implants after primary THA.
We reviewed the literature published up to June 2016 from PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to find relevant RCTs comparing SSs and conventional stems in primary THA. Quality assessment was performed by 2 independent reviewers. The RevMan 5.3 software program of the Cochrane Collaboration was used to analyze the data. Random- or fixed-effect models were used to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each comparison.
Six RCTs involving 552 patients with 572 hips were identified. Strong evidence indicated that SS prostheses were more effective for reducing thigh pain than conventional implants (I = 46%, P = 0.002; risk ratio [RR], 95% CI 0.15, 0.04-0.49). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in Harris Hip Scores (I = 0%, P = 0.84; SMD, 95% CI 0.02, -0.15-0.18), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Scores (I = 0%, P = 0.35; SMD, 95% CI 0.09, -0.10-0.27), femoral offset of stem (I = 0%, P = 0.57; SMD, 95% CI 0.06, -0.16-0.29), and leg-length discrepancy (I = 79%, P = 0.88; SMD, 95% CI 0.04, -0.44-0.51).
SS prostheses achieve the same clinical and radiological outcomes as conventional implants, and were superior in terms of reducing thigh pain. But whether the postoperative thigh pain applied in 2nd-generation cementless prosthesis still needs further large-scale multicenter studies with longer follow-up to confirm.
基金:
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81373653).
语种:
外文
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2015]版:
大类|2 区医学
小类|2 区医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类|4 区医学
小类|4 区医学:内科
第一作者:
第一作者机构:[a]Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Baiyun District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[b]Department of Orthopedics, Guangdong Province Integrative Medicine Orthopaedic Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Liwan District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China.[*1]Department of Orthopedics, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 131 Fangxin Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510360, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Shao-Chuan Huo,Fan Wang,Lu-Jue Dong,et al.Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.[J].Medicine.2016,95(43):e5215.doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000005215.
APA:
Shao-Chuan Huo,Fan Wang,Lu-Jue Dong,Wei Wei,Jing-Qi Zeng...&Rui-Qi Duan.(2016).Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials..Medicine,95,(43)
MLA:
Shao-Chuan Huo,et al."Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.".Medicine 95..43(2016):e5215