高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Fourteen small molecule and biological agents for psoriatic arthritis: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [a]Clinical Medical College, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, [b]Department of Rheumatology,The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, [c]Department of Emergency,The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, [d]Department of Pediatrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, [e]Evidence-based Medicine Research Center, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese, Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, [f]Department of Pediatrics, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: biological agents network meta-analysis psoriatic arthritis small molecule

摘要:
The comparative efficacy and safety of small molecule and biological agents in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) remain unknown. To compare the efficacy and safety of 14 small molecule and biological agents by network meta-analysis (NMA). Relevant randomized controlled trials involving biological treatments for PsA were identified by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov and by manual retrieval, up to June 2018. NMA was conducted with Stata 14.0 based on the frequentist method. Effect measures were odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Intervention efficacy and safety were ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A total of 30 studies involving 10,191 adult subjects were included. According to NMA, ≥ 20% improvement in modifed American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20) response, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) response, and serious adverse events rate (SAEs) were observed. In direct comparisons, most of the biologics performed better than placebo in terms of ACR20 response rate and PASI75 response rate. Additionally, all medicines were comparable to placebo in terms of SAEs except secukinumab. In terms of mixed comparisons, with regard to the ACR20 response, etanercept (ETN) and infliximab (IFX) were more effective than golimumab (GOL), with ORs of 3.33 (95% CI: 1.17-9.48) and 1.24 (95% CI: 0.61-2.52), respectively. For PASI75 response, IFX was superior to certolizumab pegol (OR = 10.08, 95% CI: 1.54-75.48). In addition, these medicines were comparable to each other in terms of SAEs. ETN and IFX were shown to have the most favorable SUCRA for achieving improved ACR20 and PASI75 responses, respectively, while ABT-122 exhibited the best safety according to the SUCRA for SAEs. Considering both the efficacy (ACR20, PASI75) and safety (SAEs), GOL, ETN, and IFX are the top 3 treatments. Direct and indirect comparisons and integrated results suggested that the 3 anti- tumor necrosis factor -α biologics (GOL, ETN, and IFX) can be considered the best treatments for PsA after comprehensive consideration of efficacy and safety.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [a]Clinical Medical College, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, [b]Department of Rheumatology,The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [a]Clinical Medical College, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, [d]Department of Pediatrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, [e]Evidence-based Medicine Research Center, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese, Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, [f]Department of Pediatrics, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. [*1]Clinical Medical College, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Department of Pediatr ics, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 445 Bayi Avenue, Donghu District, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, China [*2]Evidencebased Medicine Research Center, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1688 Meiling Avenue, Nanchang 330004, Jiangxi, China [*3]Department of Pediatrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, 1 Fuhua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号