高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Minimum clinical important difference for resilience scale specific to cancer: a prospective analysis.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ SSCI

机构: [1]Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China. [2]Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China. [3]Institute of Tumor, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China. [4]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Development and Research of Chinese Medicine, Mathematical Engineering Academy of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China. [5]The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 510275, Guangdong Province, China. [6]Army Medical University, Chongqing Municipality 400038, China. [7]The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China. [8]Guangdong Academy of Population Development, Guangzhou 510600, Guangdong Province, China. [9]South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong Province, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Resilience Nursing Cancer RS-SC-25 RS-SC-10 Minimum clinical important difference Anchor-based Distribution-based ROC

摘要:
The minimum clinical important differences (MCIDs) of resilience instruments in patients with cancer have not been comprehensively described. This study was designed to evaluate MCIDs of 10-item and 25-item resilience scales specific to cancer (RS-SC-10 and RS-SC-25). From June 2015 to December 2018, RS-SCs were longitudinally measured in 765 patients with different cancer diagnoses at baseline (T0) and 3 months later (T1). The EORTC QLQ-C30, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Allostatic Load Index were measured concurrently as anchors. Anchor-based methods (linear regression, within-group), distribution-based methods(within-group), and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs, within-subject) were performed to evaluate the MCIDs. 623 of 765 (84.1%) patients had paired RS-SCs scores. Moderate correlations were identified between the change in RS-SCs and change in anchors (r = 0.38-0.44, all p < 0.001). Linear regression estimated + 8.9 and - 6.7 as the MCIDs of RS-SC-25, and + 3.4 and - 2.5 for RS-SC-10. Distribution-based methods estimated + 9.9 and - 9.9 as the MCIDs of RS-SC-25, and + 4.0 and - 4.0 for RS-SC-10. ROC estimated + 5.5 and - 4.5 as the MCIDs of RS-SC-25, and + 2.0 and - 1.5 for RS-SC-10. The most reliable MCID is around 5 points for RS-SC-25 and 2 points for RS-SC-10. RS-SCs are more responsive to the worsening status of resilience in patients with cancer and these estimates could be useful in future resilience-based intervention trials.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 卫生保健与服务
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 卫生保健与服务 2 区 卫生政策与服务
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
最新[2023]版:
Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号