高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Shenfu Injection for Heart Failure

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]The Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510120, China [2]The First Clinical Medical College of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province 255014, China [3]Research Base of the Clinical Application of Traditional Chinese Medicine Classics, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510120, China [4]Department of Neurology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510120, China [5]School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510515, China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Objectives. Shenfu Injection (SFI) was widely used in the treatment of heart failure (HF) in China. A plethora of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) has been conducted in this research area, although with scattered results. The purpose of this overview was to conduct a comprehensive review to summarize and critically evaluate the existing evidence. Methods. Digital databases were searched for SRs/MAs up to January 28, 2021. Two authors independently screened the reviews and assessed the methodological quality of included SRs/MAs using Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2). Quality of evidence for outcomes evaluated within the reviews was appraised with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results. Thirteen SRs/MAs met the inclusion criteria. Based on AMSTAR-2, the quality of all SRs/MAs was critically low, because all of them have more than one critical domains that were unmet. Based on GRADE, the evidence quality of 24 outcome measures was low or very low, 27 outcome measures was moderate, and none outcome measure was high. Descriptive analysis showed that SFI was an effective and safe method for HF. Conclusions. The use of SFI for the treatment of HF may be clinically effective and safe. However, this conclusion must be interpreted cautiously due to the generally low methodological quality and low evidence quality of the included SRs/MAs. More rigorously designed SRs/MAs and RCTs with high methodological quality are necessary for further proof.

语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 心脏和心血管系统 4 区 药学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 心脏和心血管系统 3 区 药学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]The Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510120, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号