Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting
机构:[1]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China大德路总院肛肠科大德路总院肛肠科广东省中医院[2]The Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China广东省中医院深圳市中医院深圳医学信息中心[3]Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China[4]Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China广东省人民医院[5]Department of General Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510500, China
Objective: Laparoscopic resection is increasingly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the laparoscopic approach for GISTs located in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ-GIST) is surgically challenging. This study compares the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and the open procedure for EGJ-GIST through the propensity score weighting (PSW) method. Methods: Between April 2006 and April 2018, 1,824 surgical patients were diagnosed with primary gastric GIST at four medical centers in South China. Of these patients, 228 were identified as EGJ-GISTs and retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological characteristics, operative information, and long-term outcomes. PSW was used to create the balanced cohorts. Results: PSW was carried out in laparoscopic and open-surgery cohorts according to year of surgery, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, mitotic rates and recurrence risk. After PSW, 438 patients consisting of 213 laparoscopic (L group) and 225 open surgery (0 group) patients were enrolled. After PSW, the following measures in the L group were superior to those in the 0 group: median operative time [interquartile range (IQR)] : 100.0 (64.5-141.5) vs. 149.0 (104.0-197.5) min, P<0.001; median blood loss (IQR): 30.0 (10.0-50.0) vs. 50.0 (20.0-100.0) mL, P=0.002; median time to liquid intake (IQR): 3.0 (2.0-4.0) vs. 4.0 (3.0-5.0) d, P<0.001; median hospital stay (IQR): 6.0 (4.0-8.0) vs. 7.0 (5.0-12.0) d, P<0.001; and postoperative complications (10.3% vs. 22.7%, P=0.001). The median follow-up was 55 (range, 2-153) months in the entire cohort. No significant differences were detected in either relapse-free survival (RFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.372, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.072-1.910, P=0.236) or overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.400, 95% CI: 0.119-1.343, P=0.138) between the two groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery for EGJ-GIST is associated with the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, shorter time to liquid intake, and shorter length of stay, all without compromising postoperative outcomes and long-term survival.
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China[3]Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China[4]Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China[*1]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.[*2]Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.[*3]Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou 510080, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Xiong Wenjun,Xu Yuting,Chen Tao,et al.Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting[J].CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH.2021,33(1):42-52.doi:10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.01.05.
APA:
Xiong, Wenjun,Xu, Yuting,Chen, Tao,Feng, Xingyu,Zhou, Rui...&Wang, Wei.(2021).Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting.CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH,33,(1)
MLA:
Xiong, Wenjun,et al."Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting".CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH 33..1(2021):42-52