高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ 统计源期刊 ◇ CSCD-C ◇ 卓越:梯队期刊

机构: [1]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China [2]The Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China [3]Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China [4]Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China [5]Department of General Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510500, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Esophagogastric junction gastrointestinal stromal tumor laparoscopic surgery open surgery propensity score weighting

摘要:
Objective: Laparoscopic resection is increasingly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the laparoscopic approach for GISTs located in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ-GIST) is surgically challenging. This study compares the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and the open procedure for EGJ-GIST through the propensity score weighting (PSW) method. Methods: Between April 2006 and April 2018, 1,824 surgical patients were diagnosed with primary gastric GIST at four medical centers in South China. Of these patients, 228 were identified as EGJ-GISTs and retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological characteristics, operative information, and long-term outcomes. PSW was used to create the balanced cohorts. Results: PSW was carried out in laparoscopic and open-surgery cohorts according to year of surgery, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, mitotic rates and recurrence risk. After PSW, 438 patients consisting of 213 laparoscopic (L group) and 225 open surgery (0 group) patients were enrolled. After PSW, the following measures in the L group were superior to those in the 0 group: median operative time [interquartile range (IQR)] : 100.0 (64.5-141.5) vs. 149.0 (104.0-197.5) min, P<0.001; median blood loss (IQR): 30.0 (10.0-50.0) vs. 50.0 (20.0-100.0) mL, P=0.002; median time to liquid intake (IQR): 3.0 (2.0-4.0) vs. 4.0 (3.0-5.0) d, P<0.001; median hospital stay (IQR): 6.0 (4.0-8.0) vs. 7.0 (5.0-12.0) d, P<0.001; and postoperative complications (10.3% vs. 22.7%, P=0.001). The median follow-up was 55 (range, 2-153) months in the entire cohort. No significant differences were detected in either relapse-free survival (RFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.372, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.072-1.910, P=0.236) or overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.400, 95% CI: 0.119-1.343, P=0.138) between the two groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery for EGJ-GIST is associated with the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, shorter time to liquid intake, and shorter length of stay, all without compromising postoperative outcomes and long-term survival.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 肿瘤学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q2 ONCOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 ONCOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China [3]Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China [4]Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China [*1]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China. [*2]Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China. [*3]Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou 510080, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号