高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Acupressure on Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [a]The Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, China [b]Massage Department, Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Objectives. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupressure on low back pain (LBP). Methods. We searched 7 electronic databases and 2 trial registries through December 28, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupressure on LBP were considered for meta-analysis with Revman 5.3 and Stata 15.0 software. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to quantify the statistical reliability. HETRED analysis and GRADE were used to determine the heterogeneity and quality of the results, respectively. Results. Twenty-three RCTs representing 2400 participants were included. Acupressure was superior to tuina massage on response rate (RR 1.25; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.35; P<0.00001) and in the standardized mean difference (SMD) for pain reduction [SMD -1.92; 95% CI, -3.09 to -0.76; P=0.001]. Likewise, acupressure was superior to physical therapy [SMD, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.65; P<0.00001] and to usual care [SMD, -0.32; 95% CI, -0.61 to -0.02; P=0.04] in pain reduction. The Oswestry Disability Index was significantly improved by acupressure compared with usual care [SMD, -0.55; 95% CI, -0.84 to -0.25; P=0.0003]. The combination of acupressure with either manual acupuncture or electro-acupuncture showed significant improvements over the adjuvant therapies alone in response rate [RR 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.26; P<0.00001], pain reduction, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA). However, each study displayed substantial heterogeneity. Through subgroup sensitivity analysis and -HETRED analysis, the heterogeneity of acupressure compared with manual acupuncture decreased while the results maintained significance with respect to pain reduction [SMD -0.9; 95% CI, -1.21 to -0.6; P<0.00001] and JOA [SMD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.98; P<0.00001]. Similar results were obtained comparing acupressure with electro-acupuncture with respect to pain [SMD, -1.07; 95% CI, -1.33 to -0.81; P<0.00001] and JOA [SMD, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.27, P<0.00001]. TSA demonstrated the effectiveness of acupressure as a standalone or as a combinative treatment (with manual acupuncture or electro-acupuncture) for LBP. Conclusion. Acupressure is an effective treatment for LBP. However, GRADE assessments downgraded the evidence in the trials, indicating that additional investigations are needed to confirm these observations. © 2021 Tao Li et al.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 全科医学与补充医学
最新[2025]版:
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
最新[2023]版:

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [a]The Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, China [b]Massage Department, Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [a]The Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, China [b]Massage Department, Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号