高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Safflower Injection in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zunyi Medical University, Zhuhai Campus, Zhuhai 519041, China [2]The Second School of Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China [3]The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China [4]State Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China [5]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Research on Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangzhou 510120, China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Background. Safflower injection (SFI), a popular Chinese patent drug, is commonly used to treat acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) in China. The research seeks to scientifically estimate the clinical efficacy of SFI for ACS patients. Methods. Eight electronic databases were retrieved for eligible research from the founding date to September 8, 2020. Odds ratio (OR) was adopted to assess the total effective rate, ECG improvement, and adverse reaction, and mean difference (MD) was used for assessing the hemorheology indexes as well as the LVEF. Results. Sixteen randomized controlled trials involving 1620 sufferers with ACS were incorporated. The outcomes showed that, in comparison to conventional medication alone, SFI combined with conventional treatment remarkably enhanced the total effective rate (OR = 3.66, 95% CI [2.73, 4.90], P<0.00001), ECG improvement (OR = 2.85, 95% CI [2.04, 3.99], P<0.00001), and LVEF (MD = 5.13, 95% CI [3.73, 6.53], P<0.00001). Moreover, SFI combined with conventional treatment significantly decreased hemorheology indexes including BV (MD = -0.95, 95% CI [-1.76, -0.13], P=0.02), HCT (MD = -2.37, 95% CI [-3.25, -1.50], P<0.00001), FIB (MD = -0.44, 95% CI [-0.60, -0.29], P<0.00001), and PAR (OR = -7.65, 95% CI [-10.16, -5.14], P<0.00001). However, no notable contrast was observed to link the experimental and the control team for PV (MD = -0.42, 95% CI [-0.83, 0.00], P=0.05) and adverse reactions (OR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.13, 2.74], P=0.50). Conclusion. Despite the limitations that existed in this meta-analysis, the outcomes demonstrated that SFI and conventional combined medication is an effective and relatively safe therapy for ACS sufferers.

基金:

基金编号: NSFC

语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 全科医学与补充医学
最新[2025]版:
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
最新[2023]版:

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zunyi Medical University, Zhuhai Campus, Zhuhai 519041, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [3]The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China [4]State Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China [5]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Research on Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangzhou 510120, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2022 今日访问量:0 总访问量:648 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号