高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Development and Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Tension-Type Headache

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ SSCI

机构: [1]The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of ChineseMedicine), Guangzhou, China [2]Department of Neurology, Shantou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shantou, China [3]Department of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of ChineseMedicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China [4]Department of Neurology, ZhejiangProvincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China [5]Fuyong People’s Hospital of Baoan District, Shenzhen, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: tension-type headache patient-reported outcome classical test theory reliability validity

摘要:
Objective: To validate a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for patients with tension-type headache (TTH).</p> Methods: Literature analysis, interview, and group discussion were performed to develop an initial TTH-PRO. Thereafter, the initial scale was pre-evaluation in a small range of patients with TTH, and the expert panel made necessary adjustments based on the content feedback. The clinical test was carried out by using the adjusted initial scale. Based on the test results, the items were screened by the method of classical test theory to form the final scale, and the performance evaluation indicators such as validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the final scale were tested.</p> Results: The final formed TTH-PRO scale contained three domains, six dimensions, and 30 items. The split-half reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficients, and construct validity of the scale were acceptable, as was feasibility. The responsiveness in the physiological domain was fair, but the overall responsiveness still needed further clinical validation.</p> Conclusions:The TTH-PRO scale has been developed with extensive patient input and demonstrates evidence for reliability and validity. It is complementary to existing evaluation indicators of TTH, emphasizing the patient's experience. Further studies are needed to optimize its items and to verify its clinical applicability for population in more regions and countries.</p>

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 临床神经病学 3 区 神经科学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 临床神经病学 3 区 神经科学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
最新[2023]版:
Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q3 NEUROSCIENCES

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of ChineseMedicine), Guangzhou, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号