高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Afliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China [2]The First Clinical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China [3]Ling‑Nan Medical Research Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 12, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China [4]The First Afliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Levosimendan and dobutamine are extensively used to treat sepsis-associated cardiovascular failure in ICU. Nevertheless, the role and mechanism of levosimendan in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy remains unclear. Moreover, previous studies on whether levosimendan is superior to dobutamine are still controversial. More importantly, these studies did not take changes (before-after comparison to the baseline) in quantitative parameters such as ejection fraction into account with the baseline level. Here, we aimed to determine the pros and cons of the two medicines by assessing the changes in cardiac function and blood lactate, mortality, with the standardized mean difference used as a summary statistic. Relevant studies were obtained by a thorough and disciplined literature search in several notable academic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase until November 2020. Outcomes included changes in cardiac function, lactic acid, mortality and length of hospital stay. A total of 6 randomized controlled trials were included in this study, including 192 patients. Compared with dobutamine, patients treated with levosimendan had a greater improvement of cardiac index (ΔCI) (random effects, SMD = 0.90 [0.20,1.60]; I2 = 76%, P < 0.01) and left ventricular stroke work index (ΔLVSWI) (random effects, SMD = 1.56 [0.90,2.21]; I2 = 65%, P = 0.04), a significant decrease of blood lactate (Δblood lactate) (random effects, MD =  - 0.79 [- 1.33, - 0.25]; I2 = 68%, P < 0.01) at 24-h after drug intervention, respectively. There was no significant difference between levosimendan and dobutamine on all-cause mortality in ICU (fixed effect, OR = 0.72 [0.39,1.33]; I2 = 0%, P = 0.99). We combine effect sizes related to different measurement parameters to evaluate cardiac function, which implied that septic patients with myocardial dysfunction might have a better improvement of cardiac function by levosimendan than dobutamine (random effects, SMD = 1.05 [0.69,1.41]; I2 = 67%, P < 0.01). This study suggested a significant improvement of CI, LVSWI, and decrease of blood lactate in septic patients with myocardial dysfunction in ICU after 24-h administration of levosimendan than dobutamine. However, the administration of levosimendan has neither an impact on mortality nor LVEF. Septic patients with myocardial dysfunction may partly benefit from levosimendan than dobutamine, mainly embodied in cardiac function improvement.© 2021. The Author(s).

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 3 区 综合性期刊
小类 | 3 区 综合性期刊
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 综合性期刊
小类 | 3 区 综合性期刊
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
最新[2023]版:
Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Afliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China [2]The First Clinical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Afliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China [2]The First Clinical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China [3]Ling‑Nan Medical Research Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 12, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China [4]The First Afliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2020 今日访问量:0 总访问量:646 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号