高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

The Systematic Assessment of Traditional Evidence from the Premodern Chinese Medical Literature: A Text-Mining Approach

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Traditional & Complementary Medicine Research Program, Health Innovations Research Institute.WHO Collaborating Centre for Traditional Medicine, Discipline of Chinese Medicine, School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia. [2]Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Objectives: This project aimed to develop an approach to evaluating information contained in the premodern Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) literature that was (1) comprehensive, systematic, and replicable and (2) able to produce quantifiable output that could be used to answer specific research questions in order to identify natural products for clinical and experimental research. Methods: The project involved two stages. In stage 1, 14 TCM collections and compendia were evaluated for suitability as sources for searching; 8 of these were compared in detail. The results were published in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. Stage 2 developed a text-mining approach for two of these sources. Results: The text-mining approach was developed for Zhong Hua Yi Dian; Encyclopaedia of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 4th edition) and Zhong Yi Fang Ji Da Ci Dian; Great Compendium of Chinese Medical Formulae). This approach developed procedures for search term selection; methods for screening, classifying, and scoring data; procedures for systematic searching and data extraction; data checking procedures; and approaches for analyzing results. Examples are provided for studies of memory impairment and diabetic nephropathy, and issues relating to data interpretation are discussed. Conclusions: This approach to the analysis of large collections of the premodern TCM literature uses widely available sources and provides a text-mining approach that is systematic, replicable, and adaptable to the requirements of the particular project. Researchers can use these methods to explore changes in the names and conceptions of a disease over time, to identify which therapeutic methods have been more or less frequently used in different eras for particular disorders, and to assist in the selection of natural products for research efforts.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2013]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 全科医学与补充医学
最新[2025]版:
JCR分区:
出版当年[2012]版:
Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
最新[2023]版:
Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2012版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2011版] 出版后一年[2013版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Traditional & Complementary Medicine Research Program, Health Innovations Research Institute.WHO Collaborating Centre for Traditional Medicine, Discipline of Chinese Medicine, School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Traditional & Complementary Medicine Research Program, Health Innovations Research Institute.WHO Collaborating Centre for Traditional Medicine, Discipline of Chinese Medicine, School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia. [2]Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China. [*1]Traditional & Complementary Medicine Research Program Health Innovations Research Institute WHO Collaborating Centre for Traditional Medicine Discipline of Chinese Medicine School of Health Sciences, RMIT University P.O. Box 71 Bundoora, Victoria 3083 Australia
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2022 今日访问量:0 总访问量:648 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号