高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]The Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. [2]Department of Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. [3]Emergency Department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. [4]Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shen Zhen, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Chinese herbal injections efficacy network meta-analysis septic shock

摘要:
Septic shock is a life-threatening syndrome. Despite Western medicine guidelines being continually updated on septic shock, the disease still has a high mortality rate. Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are injections made from effective components of traditional Chinese medicine, which have a potential therapeutic effect on septic shock and are recommended as the adjunctive treatment for septic shock in China. Although pairwise meta-analysis has been published for category-single CHIs about treatment effects of septic shock, there is no meta-analysis comparing more than 3 various types of CHIs used for septic shock.Chinese and English databases will be retrieved for randomized controlled trials from the establishment of the databases to September 30, 2021. Two reviewers will perform literature searches and data extractions while another 2 reviewers for risk assessments. RevMan V.5.4 software, Stata V.14.0 software, and R V. 4.1.1 software will be applied to perform pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. We will apply the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the risk of bias while the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to summarize the results of the study. The PRISMA-P guideline was followed for this protocol.The current study will explore the therapeutic effect of CHIs in the treatment of septic shock through pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.This study will seek out the best-performed CHIs under various indicators for septic shock, providing supporting evidence for clinical selection of CHIs for septic shock.Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2024]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]The Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. [2]Department of Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [4]Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shen Zhen, China. [*1]Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, 1 Fuhua Road, Shenzhen 518000, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2027 今日访问量:0 总访问量:659 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号