高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Single tunnel technique versus coracoid sling technique for arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, Shenzhen 518035, Guangdong, China. [2]Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530229, Guangxi, China. [3]Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Shenzhen Breast Tumor Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment, National Standardization Center for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, Shenzhen 518035, Guangdong, China. [4]Teaching Office, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, Shenzhen 518035, Guangdong, China. [5]Department of Orthopedics, Shenzhen Shekou People’s Hospital, Shenzhen 518067, Guangdong, China. [6]Department of Orthopaedics, Yiyang Central Hospital, Yiyang 413000, Hunan, China. [7]McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77054, USA.
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
To evaluate and compare the efficacy of two techniques for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation, the charts of 60 patients diagnosed with acute Rockwood type IV and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation that undergone arthroscopic fixation procedure with single tunnel technique (N = 30, 30.7 ± 5.7 years old) or coracoid sling technique (N = 30, 30.1 ± 5.4 years old) fixation were retrospectively reviewed. The Visual Analog Scale pain score, Constant shoulder functionality score, Karlsson acromioclavicular joint score, the time of return to sports and activity, and plain radiographs of the affected shoulder at different time points of follow-up were recorded for a minimum of 2 years post-op. The majority of the patients recovered to their preoperative activity levels with few complications. The average postoperative acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular distances were significantly narrower than preoperative measurements in both groups without significant difference between the two groups at 2 years post-op (P < 0.05). The coracoid sling technique group had reduced operative time, shorter time of recovery of shoulder movements, higher Constant functionality scores and Karlsson acromioclavicular joint scores, and fewer complications than the single tunnel technique group at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). Therefore, coracoid sling technique achieved superior clinical outcomes with fewer complications compared to the traditional single tunnel technique in arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.© 2022. The Author(s).

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 3 区 综合性期刊
小类 | 3 区 综合性期刊
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 综合性期刊
小类 | 3 区 综合性期刊
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
最新[2023]版:
Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, Shenzhen 518035, Guangdong, China.
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, Shenzhen 518035, Guangdong, China. [2]Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530229, Guangxi, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号