高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Electroacupuncture for Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]THe First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 16 Airport Road, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, China [2]THe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China [3]Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China [4]Shenzhen Nanshan District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen Bay Section 2248-8 Shekou Street Zhongxin Road, Shenzhen 518054, Guangdong, China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Previous studies have shown that electroacupuncture (EA) has a positive effect on motor and sensory function in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). This review evaluated the effectiveness of EA for improvement in activities of daily living in patients with SCI.We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases using a search strategy according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions up to 30th September 2020. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of EA in patients with SCI were included. We analyzed the data using RevMan (version 5.3) and graded the quality of evidence using GRADE profiler 3.6.1.This meta-analysis included 10 RCTs with 712 patients. Three studies revealed that the functional independence measure score for SCI patients in the EA group was higher than that in the control group (mean difference [MD] = 13.46, 95% CI: 8.00 to 18.92, P < 0.00001). Five studies showed that the modified Barthel index in the EA group was higher than that in the control group (MD = 6.92, 95% CI: 4.96 to 8.89, P < 0.00001). Five studies showed that the American Spinal Injury Association-motor score (ASIA-motor score) in the EA group was higher than that in the control group (standard MD = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.18, P < 0.00001). Three studies reported the ASIA-tactile and pain scores and also reported that the scores in the EA group were higher than those in the control group, with high homogeneity (tactile I2 = 86%, P = 0.0008; pain I2 = 54%, P = 0.11). The quality of evidence for the use of EA for improvement in motor and sensory function in SCIs was moderate according to the GRADE system.This review suggested that EA improves activities of daily living and motor function in patients with SCI, with a moderate level of evidence.Copyright © 2022 Jiuqing Tan et al.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 全科医学与补充医学
最新[2025]版:
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
最新[2023]版:

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]THe First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 16 Airport Road, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]THe First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 16 Airport Road, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, China [4]Shenzhen Nanshan District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen Bay Section 2248-8 Shekou Street Zhongxin Road, Shenzhen 518054, Guangdong, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号