高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Deep transfer learning to quantify pleural effusion severity in chest X-rays.

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Department of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China. [2]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China. [3]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Informatization, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
出处:

摘要:
The detection of pleural effusion in chest radiography is crucial for doctors to make timely treatment decisions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We used the MIMIC-CXR database to develop a deep learning model to quantify pleural effusion severity in chest radiographs.The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Chest X-ray (MIMIC-CXR) dataset was divided into patients 'with' or 'without' chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The label of pleural effusion severity was obtained from the extracted COPD radiology reports and classified into four categories: no effusion, small effusion, moderate effusion, and large effusion. A total of 200 datasets were randomly sampled to manually check each item and determine whether the tags are correct. A professional doctor re-tagged these items as a verification cohort without knowing their previous tags. The learning models include eight common network structures including Resnet, DenseNet, and GoogleNET. Three data processing methods (no sampling, downsampling, and upsampling) and two loss algorithms (focal loss and cross-entropy loss) were used for unbalanced data. The Neural Network Intelligence tool was applied to train the model. Receiver operating characteristic curves, Area under the curve, and confusion matrix were employed to evaluate the model results. Grad-CAM was used for model interpretation.Among the 8533 patients, 15,620 chest X-rays with clearly marked pleural effusion severity were obtained (no effusion, 5685; small effusion, 4877; moderate effusion, 3657; and large effusion, 1401). The error rate of the manual check label was 6.5%, and the error rate of the doctor's relabeling was 11.0%. The highest accuracy rate of the optimized model was 73.07. The micro-average AUCs of the testing and validation cohorts was 0.89 and 0.90, respectively, and their macro-average AUCs were 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. The AUC of the distinguishing results of each class and the other three classes were 0.95 and 0.94, 0.76 and 0.83, 0.85 and 0.83, and 0.87 and 0.93.The deep transfer learning model can grade the severity of pleural effusion.© 2022. The Author(s).

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 核医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 核医学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China. [3]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Informatization, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号