高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Efficacy and safety of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine against COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research on Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China [2]Science and Technology Innovation Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: COVID-19 integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine meta-analysis randomized controlled trial systematic review

摘要:
Although plenty of clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy and safety of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine (ITCWM) against COVID-19, the role of ITCWM remains controversial. So we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies in eight major databases that report the outcomes of interest in COVID-19 patients receiving ITCWM. RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis, while the quality of RCTs was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the retrospective studies were assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Eventually, a total of 53 studies with 5425 COVID-19 patients was identified. The meta-analysis results showed that ITCWM was significantly better than western medicine treatment (WMT) alone in the percentage of cases changing to severe/critical [RR = 0.40, 95%CI (0.33, 0.49), p < .00001, I-2 = 10%], overall clinical effectiveness [RR = 1.26, 95% CI (1.18, 1.35), p < .00001, I-2 = 50%], time to defervescencer [MD = -1.45, 95% CI (-1.82, -1.07), p < .00001, I-2 = 83%], disappearing time of cough [MD = -2.11, 95% CI (-2.98, -1.25), p < .00001, I-2 = 93%], time of RT-PCR negativity [MD = -3.35, 95% CI (-4.74, -1.95), p < .00001, I-2 = 92%], length of hospital stay [MD = -4.05, 95% CI (-5.24, -2.85), p < .00001, I-2 = 91%], improvement in CT scan [RR = 1.22, 95% CI (1.17, 1.28), p < .00001, I-2 = 46%], TCM syndrome score [MD = -3.95, 95% CI (-5.07, -2.82), p < .00001, I-2 = 92%], disappearance rate of fever [RR = 1.23, 95% CI (1.10, 1.38), p < .00001, I-2 = 85%], disappearance rate of cough [RR = 1.43, 95% CI (1.25, 1.63), p < .00001, I-2 = 60%], level of CRP [MD = -9.23, 95% CI (-10.94, -7.52), p < .00001, I-2 = 97%], and WBC [MD = -9.23, 95% CI (-10.94, -7.52), p < .00001, I-2 = 97%]. There is no significant difference between ITCWM and WMT in the adverse reaction rate [RR = 0.85, 95% CI(0.71, 1.03), p = .10, I-2 = 25%]. Our results showed evidence of clinical efficacy and safety benefit in COVID-19 patients treated with ITCWM. In spite of some limitations, the rapidly developing global pandemic warrants further high-quality and multicenter clinical studies to confirm the contribution of ITCWM.

基金:

基金编号: 82074342

语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 药物化学 2 区 药学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 药物化学 2 区 药学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research on Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research on Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China [*1]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research on Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 232 Waihuandong Road, University Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510006, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号