高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ 预警期刊

机构: [1]Jinan Univ, Guangzhou Red Cross Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China [2]Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Lab Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: laparoscopic distal gastrectomy open distal gastrectomy advanced gastric cancer meta-analysis systematic review stomach neoplasms laparoscopy

摘要:
ObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with those of open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who exclusively underwent distal gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). BackgroundData in published meta-analyses that included different gastrectomy types and mixed tumor stages prevented an accurate comparison between LDG and ODG. Recently, several RCTs that compared LDG with ODG included AGC patients specifically for distal gastrectomy, with D2 lymphadenectomy being reported and updated with the long-term outcomes. MethodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify RCTs for comparing LDG with ODG for advanced distal gastric cancer. Short-term surgical outcomes and mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival were compared. The Cochrane tool and GRADE approach were used for evaluating the quality of evidence (Prospero registration ID: CRD42022301155). ResultsFive RCTs consisting of a total of 2,746 patients were included. Meta-analyses showed no significant differences in terms of intraoperative complications, overall morbidity, severe postoperative complications, R0 resection, D2 lymphadenectomy, recurrence, 3-year disease-free survival, intraoperative blood transfusion, time to first liquid diet, time to first ambulation, distal margin, reoperation, mortality, or readmission between LDG and ODG. Operative times were significantly longer for LDG [weighted mean difference (WMD) 49.2 min, p < 0.05], whereas harvested lymph nodes, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, time to first flatus, and proximal margin were lower for LDG (WMD -1.3, p < 0.05; WMD -33.6 mL, p < 0.05; WMD -0.7 day, p < 0.05; WMD -0.2 day, p < 0.05; WMD -0.4 mm, p < 0.05). Intra-abdominal fluid collection and bleeding were found to be less after LDG. Certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. ConclusionsData from five RCTs suggest that LDG with D2 lymphadenectomy for AGC has similar short-term surgical outcomes and long-term survival to ODG when performed by experienced surgeons in hospitals contending with high patient volumes. It can be concluded that RCTs should highlight the potential advantages of LDG for AGC. Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO, registration number CRD42022301155.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 外科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 外科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q2 SURGERY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 SURGERY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Jinan Univ, Guangzhou Red Cross Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号