高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Clinical evidence of three traditional Chinese medicine drugs and three herbal formulas for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Chinese population

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ 统计源期刊 ◇ CSCD-C

机构: [1]Dongzhimen Hospital Key Laboratory, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China [2]Key Laboratory of Internal Medicine of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China [3]School of Medical Information Engineering, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China [4]The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230031, Anhui Province, China [5]Institute of Clinical Basic Medicine of Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China [6]Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, Hubei Province, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Traditional Chinese medicine Coronavirus disease 2019 Herbal formulas Systematic review Meta-analysis

摘要:
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread worldwide. Integrated Chinese and Western medicine have had some successes in treating COVID-19.This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three traditional Chinese medicine drugs and three herbal formulas (3-drugs-3-formulas) in patients with COVID-19.Relevant studies were identified from 12 electronic databases searched from their establishment to April 7, 2022.Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and cohort studies that evaluated the effects of 3-drugs-3-formulas for COVID-19. The treatment group was treated with one of the 3-drugs-3-formulas plus conventional treatment. The control group was treated with conventional treatment.Two evaluators screened and selected literature independently, then extracted basic information and assessed risk of bias. The treatment outcome measures were duration of main symptoms, hospitalization time, aggravation rate and mortality. RevMan 5.4 was used to analyze the pooled results reported as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data and risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI for dichotomous data.Forty-one studies with a total of 13,260 participants were identified. Our analysis suggests that compared with conventional treatment, the combination of 3-drugs-3-formulas might shorten duration of fever (MD = -1.39; 95% CI: -2.19 to -0.59; P < 0.05), cough (MD = -1.57; 95% CI: -2.16 to -0.98; P < 0.05) and fatigue (MD = -1.36; 95% CI: -2.21 to -0.51; P < 0.05), decrease length of hospital stay (MD = -2.62; 95% CI -3.52 to -1.72; P < 0.05), the time for nucleic acid conversion (MD = -2.92; 95% CI: -4.26 to -1.59; P < 0.05), aggravation rate (RR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.64; P < 0.05) and mortality (RR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.62; P < 0.05), and increase the recovery rate of chest computerized tomography manifestations (RR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.3; P < 0.05) and total effectiveness (RR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.42; P < 0.05).The 3-drugs-3-formulas can play an active role in treating all stages of COVID-19. No severe adverse events related to 3-drugs-3-formulas were observed. Hence, 3-drugs-3-formulas combined with conventional therapies have effective therapeutic value for COVID-19 patients. Further long-term high-quality studies are essential to demonstrate the clinical benefits of each formula. Please cite this article as: You LZ, Dai QQ, Zhong XY, Yu DD, Cui HR, Kong YF, Zhao MZ, Zhang XY, Xu QQ, Guan ZY, Wei XX, Zhang XC, Han SJ, Liu WJ, Chen Z, Zhang XY, Zhao C, Jin YH, Shang HC. Clinical evidence of three traditional Chinese medicine drugs and three herbal formulas for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Chinese population. J Integr Med. 2023; Epub ahead of print.Copyright © 2023 Shanghai Changhai Hospital. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 全科医学与补充医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 全科医学与补充医学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Dongzhimen Hospital Key Laboratory, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China [2]Key Laboratory of Internal Medicine of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Dongzhimen Hospital Key Laboratory, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China [2]Key Laboratory of Internal Medicine of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China [*1]Dongzhimen Hospital Key Laboratory, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号