高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Comparative effectiveness of ustekinumab vs. vedolizumab for anti-TNF-naïve or anti-TNF-exposed Crohn’s disease: a multicenter cohort study

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. [2]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. [3]Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. [4]Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China. [5]Department of Nutrition, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, PR China. [6]Department of Gastroenterology, Liuzhou People's Hospital, Liuzhou, PR China. [7]Department of Gastroenterology, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou, PR China. [8]Department of Gastroenterology, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated Guangxi University of TCM, Nanning, PR China. [9]Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China. [10]Center of Clinical Research, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. [11]Department of Small Bowel Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Crohn’s disease ustekinumab vedolizumab

摘要:
Ustekinumab and vedolizumab are both effective for treating Crohn's disease (CD). However, no head-to-head trials have been conducted thus far. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in CD patients either naïve or exposed to tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi).Patients treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab for luminal CD were included from six centers in China from May 2020 to July 2023. Steroid-free remission, clinical remission, objective response, and remission at Weeks 26 and 52 were evaluated in a retrospective multicenter propensity score-weighted cohort.A total of 536 patients were included (386 ustekinumab, and 150 vedolizumab). After adjustment, ustekinumab showed higher rates of clinical remission (56.4% vs. 47.8%, P = 0.005), steroid-free remission (55.4% vs. 46.1%, P = 0.003), and objective response (67.8% vs. 42.7%, P < 0.001) than vedolizumab at Week 26. At Week 52, ustekinumab exhibited significantly higher rates of clinical remission (65.8% vs. 37.5%, P < 0.001), steroid-free remission (65.8% vs. 37.5%, P < 0.001), objective response (66.7% vs. 23.8%, P < 0.001), and objective remission (31.4% vs. 12.7%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that ustekinumab had higher rates of clinical remission, steroid-free remission, and objective response at Weeks 26 and 52, and objective remission at Week 52 in TNFi-exposed patients, while ustekinumab showed higher rates of objective response at Weeks 26 and 52 and clinical remission, steroid-free remission and objective remission at Week 52 in TNFi-naïve patients. Adverse event rates were similar between the groups (4.9% ustekinumab vs. 6.7% vedolizumab, P = 0.423).Ustekinumab showed superior clinical and objective outcomes compared to vedolizumab, with comparable safety outcomes. The therapeutic superiority was observed in both short-term and long-term phases in TNFi-exposed patients, and the long-term phase in TNFi-naïve patients.National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, Key Research Projects of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, the program of Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, and National Key Clinical Discipline.© 2023 The Authors.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. [2]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. [3]Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. [2]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. [3]Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China. [*1]Department of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 26 Yuancun Road II, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510000, PR China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号