机构:[1]The First Hospital of Yulin, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Yanan University, Yan’an, China[2]Beijing Key Laboratory of Indoor Air Quality Evaluation and Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China[3]Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China广东省中医院[4]State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Centre of Respiratory Disease, The First AffiliatedHospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China[5]State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicines, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China
Objectives To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a high-efficiency air purifier in patients with allergic rhinitis. Design We conducted a randomised, double-blind, clinical controlled trial with active and inactive versions of an air purifier. Our study included patients with allergic rhinitis who were sensitive to Artemisia pollen and treatment of the indoor environment using air filtration at night. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of indoor air filtration during the Artemisia pollen scattering season in Yulin City in Shanxi Province, China. Setting The First Hospital of Yulin (Yulin City, Shanxi Province, China). Participants A total of 90 patients with allergic rhinitis who were sensitive to allergens of Artemisia pollen were randomly assigned to one of two groups in equal numbers. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the difference in visual analogue scale scores from baseline. Secondary outcomes were changes from baseline in nasal symptoms, allergy symptom scores, responses to the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores and tolerability scores for the air purifier. Results Based on the allergy symptom score, we found significant differences in rhinitis symptoms between the groups who used the active versus the inactive air purifier. Conclusions The results of our investigation demonstrated the health benefits of particle filtration.
基金:
The Technical Research and Development Program Project in 2016 [[2017]54]
第一作者机构:[1]The First Hospital of Yulin, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Yanan University, Yan’an, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[3]Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China[4]State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Centre of Respiratory Disease, The First AffiliatedHospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China[5]State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicines, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China[*1]State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Centre of Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, 151 Yanjiang Xi Road, Guangzhou 510120, China.State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicines, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.[*2]Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou 510120, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Li Li,Zhang Li,Mo Jin-Han,et al.Efficacy of indoor air purification in the treatment of Artemisia pollen-allergic rhinitis: A randomised, double-blind, clinical controlled trial[J].CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY.2020,45(3):394-401.doi:10.1111/coa.13514.
APA:
Li, Li,Zhang, Li,Mo, Jin-Han,Li, Yun-Ying,Xia, Ji-Yan...&Chen, Qiao-Yan.(2020).Efficacy of indoor air purification in the treatment of Artemisia pollen-allergic rhinitis: A randomised, double-blind, clinical controlled trial.CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY,45,(3)
MLA:
Li, Li,et al."Efficacy of indoor air purification in the treatment of Artemisia pollen-allergic rhinitis: A randomised, double-blind, clinical controlled trial".CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY 45..3(2020):394-401