机构:[1]Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China[2]Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China[3]The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 510275, Guangdong Province, China深圳医学信息中心中国医学科学院阜外医院深圳医院[4]Institute of Tumor, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China深圳市中医院深圳医学信息中心[5]Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Development and Research of Chinese Medicine, Mathematical Engineering Academy of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China[6]The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China深圳市中医院深圳医学信息中心[7]Guangdong Academy of Population Development, Guangzhou 510600, Guangdong Province, China[8]South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong Province, ChinaC
Randomized control trials exploring adjuvant supportive-expressive group therapy (SEGT) for breast cancer have yielded conflicting survival results. This retrospective cohort study was designed to explore the association of adjuvant SEGT performed at diagnosis with survival in real-world patients.
3327 patients with breast cancer were divided between those who received oncologic treatment combined with SEGT-based intervention (referred to as BRBC [n = 354]) and those who only received oncologic treatment (referred to as OT [n = 2973]). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) at 1-year, 3-year, 5-year. Propensity score-matched analysis (at a ratio of 1:3) and instrumental variable analysis (IVA) were performed.
The median overall survival was 7.3 years (95% CI 7.0-7.7 years) in BRBC and 7.1 years (95% CI 6.9-7.4 years) in OT. BRBC was not significantly associated with improved 1-year (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.49-1.10, P = 0.1748; NNT = 44.8, 95% CI - 118.5 to 22.6), 3-year (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.75-1.27, P = 0.8640; NNT = 273.7, 95% CI - 21.0 to 21.3), or 5-year survival (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.02, P = 0.0908; NNT = 36.0, 95% CI - 384.5 to 19.1) compared with OT. IVA indicated that BRBC had a survival benefit over OT in the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year of 1.5% (95% CI 1.2-1.9%), 0.7% (95% CI 0.6-0.8%), and 2.6% (95% CI 2.0-3.4%), respectively.
Adjuvant SEGT cannot significantly prolong 5-year survival in breast cancer, though a longer observation period is warranted according to the marginal survival benefit identified at the end of the follow-up.
基金:
grants from National Natural
Science Foundation of China (No. 71904033), Humanity and
Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education (No.
19YJCZH227), Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong
Province (No. A2019484), Research Fund for Talented Scholars of
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (No. A1-AFD018), and
Innovative Project of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (No.
2016KYTD08).
第一作者机构:[1]Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Ye Zeng Jie,Zhang Zhang,Zhang Xiao Ying,et al.Effectiveness of adjuvant supportive-expressive group therapy for breast cancer.[J].BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT.2020,180(1):121-134.doi:10.1007/s10549-020-05526-4.
APA:
Ye Zeng Jie,Zhang Zhang,Zhang Xiao Ying,Tang Ying,Liang Jian...&Yu Yuan Liang.(2020).Effectiveness of adjuvant supportive-expressive group therapy for breast cancer..BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT,180,(1)
MLA:
Ye Zeng Jie,et al."Effectiveness of adjuvant supportive-expressive group therapy for breast cancer.".BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 180..1(2020):121-134