高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with autogenous bone chips and PLIF with cage for treatment of double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis.

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Spine Surgery, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China [2]Department of Spine Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China [3]Department of Minimally Invasive Pain Treatment, Mengyin County Hospital, Linyi City, Shandong Province, China [4]Department of Spine Surgery, Shilong Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Comparison Outcomes Double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis Autogenous bone chips Interbody fusion Instrumentation

摘要:
Spondylolytic defects involving multiple vertebral levels are rare. It is reported that only 1.48% of patients with back pain were diagnosed with multi-level spondylolysis. The incidence of multiple-level spondylolisthesis is even rarer, so far there have been few reports of multi-level isthmic spondylolisthesis in the literature. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of two different fusion techniques for treatment of double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis. Fifty-four patients who were managed surgically for treatment of double-level symptomatic isthmic spondylolisthesis were included in this study. Between May 2004 and September 2012, 29 consecutive patients underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with autogenous bone chips (group I) at Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong, China. Between March 2005 and December 2013, 25 consecutive patients underwent PLIF with cage (group II) at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangdong, China. The mean follow-up periods were 27.2 and 26.8 months, respectively. The mean VAS scores of back and leg pain significantly decreased from 7.2 to 2.2 and 5.8 to 2.1 in the group I and from 7.0 to 1.9 and 6.1 to 1.8 in the group II, respectively. In the group I, mean ODI scores improved significantly from 54% to 14.2% and, in the group II, from 60% to 12.6%. In both groups, VAS and ODI scores significantly changed from pre- to postoperatively (p<0.001), but postoperative outcome between groups was statistically not significant. Solid union was observed in 27 of 29 patients (89.6%) in the group I and in 22 of 25 patients (88%) in the group II, without statistically significant differences (p>0.05). In both groups, changes in disc height, degree of listhesis, and whole lumbar lordosis between the pre- and postoperative periods were significant. Clinical and functional outcomes demonstrate no significant differences between groups in treating back and leg pain of adult patients with double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2014]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 临床神经病学 4 区 外科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 临床神经病学 4 区 外科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2013]版:
Q3 SURGERY Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 SURGERY Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2013版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2012版] 出版后一年[2014版]

第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Spine Surgery, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China [*1]No. 6 Qinren Road, Foshan City, Guangdong Province528000, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2020 今日访问量:0 总访问量:646 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号