高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with tennis elbow: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Zhongshan Hospital of traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan [2]Graduate School of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, [3]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: extracorporeal shock wave therapy lateral epicondylitis meta-analysis

摘要:
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave (ECSW) in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis (LE) of humerus. ECSW therapy in people with LE effectively reduces the pain and gains functional rehabilitation. Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to April 2020 was searched to identify all relevant RCTs comparing ECSW therapy with any other conservative treatment, including injection and local anesthetic versus placebo or control in patients aged 18 with LE. The primary outcome is the mean overall pain score at 12 weeks after treatment. Another secondary outcome mainly included Thomsen test, 50% pain reduction, grip strength and adverse effect at 12 weeks after treatment. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the placebo group, ECSW cannot significantly reduce the pain score (mean deviation [MD] = -4.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.78 to 0.32, P = .07), but make more people acquire 50% pain reduction (MD = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.75, P = .008). There was no significant difference between ECSW and control in decreasing the pain score of Thomsen test (MD = -3.22, 95% CI: -14.06 to 7.62, P = .56). ECSW was more effective in Grip strength as compared with control at 12 weeks-3 months (MD = 3.52, 95% CI: 2.43 to 4.60, P < .00001) CONCLUSIONS:: Results suggested that ECSW cannot effectively reduce the mean overall pain, but it showed more people acquire 50% pain reduction and might be a better option for the treatment of LE. Because of study limitations, additional high level of evidence, more rigorously designed large-samples and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to guide clinical practice.

语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Zhongshan Hospital of traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan [*1]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Zhongshan Hospital of traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Zhongshan Hospital of traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan [3]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China. [*1]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Zhongshan Hospital of traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, China [*2]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Zhongshan Hospital of traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, China [*3]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, China, No.3 Kangxin Road, West District, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2020 今日访问量:0 总访问量:646 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号