高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Evaluating traditional Chinese medicine diagnostic instruments for functional dyspepsia: systematic review on measurement properties

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [a]School of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong [b]The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong [c]Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Hunan, China [d]The Institute of Medical Informatics, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan [e]The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong, China [f]School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong [g]Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong [h]Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Medicine Chinese traditional Dyspepsia Systematic review Validation study Psychometrics Surveys and questionnaires

摘要:
Background: Pattern diagnosis-guided treatments in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has been recognised by the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Accurate pattern diagnosis requires reliable and valid diagnostic instruments that guide the collection of TCM clinical data without bias. This study synthesised the existing TCM diagnostic instruments for functional dyspepsia (FD) and appraised their quality regarding their development process and measurement properties. Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched for validation studies on TCM diagnostic instruments for FD. Synthesis and appraisal of the included studies were performed following the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) Initiative guidelines adapted for TCM diagnostic instruments. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist. Results: Five studies were included, with five unique TCM diagnostic instruments for FD identified. All five diagnostic instruments were of inadequate quality in terms of their development process, implying a shortcoming in their relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. Only the criterion validity of Stomach Qi Deficiency Pattern Assessment Scale was of sufficient quality and had no risk of bias in its validation. Conclusion: The quality of TCM diagnostic instruments for FD warrants urgent improvements. None of them was considered reliable or valid for guiding TCM pattern diagnosis. To support the evidence base of the standardization of TCM patterns in ICD-11, TCM diagnostic instruments should be developed and validated rigorously under the COSMIN guidelines. Amendments should be made on the guidelines to accommodate the features and uniqueness of TCM diagnostic process. © 2020

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 全科医学与补充医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 全科医学与补充医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
最新[2023]版:
Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [a]School of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [a]School of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong [b]The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong [*1]School of Public Health and Primary Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, Room 413, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号