高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Comparative efficacy and dysmenorrhea score of 6 object-separated moxibustions for the treatment of Chinese patients with dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ 预警期刊

机构: [a]Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510009, Guangdong [b]Guangdong Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou 510009, Guangdong, [c]Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650500, [d]Guangdong Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Research and Development, Guangzhou 510095, Guangdong, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: dysmenorrhea score network meta-analysis object-separated moxibustions primary dysmenorrhea

摘要:
Primary dysmenorrhea (PD), one of the most common diseases in women, is known to be effective with object-separated moxibustion. However, because there is no large sample size for comparison, it is difficult to choose the best method for the clinical treatment of these different treatments. Therefore, our aim was to compare and rank different moxibustion methods to determine the most effective treatment method for PD.A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature, to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the object-separated moxibustion is associated with dysmenorrhea, as well as we also manually checked the bibliographies of eligible studies and topic-related reviews, RCTs from their inception to May 1, 2020. Three investigators read the citations and excluded quasi-randomized trials and trials that were incomplete. We extracted data following a predefined hierarchy. We assessed the studies' risk of bias in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The primary outcomes were efficacy (response rate) and dysmenorrhea scores. We estimated the summary odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) using pairwise and network meta-analyses with random effects. STATA software version 16.0, ADDIS software version 1.16.5, and R software version 3.6.1 were used to statistically analyze all data.Fifty-six RCTs with 5550 patients were included, comparing 6 object-separated moxibustion therapies with acupuncture or oral medicine. All moxibustions were more effective than ibuprofen, with OR ranging between 6.75 (95%CI: 3.58 to 13.22) for moxibustion at the navel. For relieving pain which uses dysmenorrhea score to evaluate, mild moxibustion (MD = -1.42, -4.24 to 0.85) was more effective than others. A total of 24 (42.8%) of 56 trials were rated as having a high risk of bias, 31(55.4%) as moderate, and 1(1.8%) as low, and the certainty of the evidence was moderate.Mild moxibustion cannot only effectively treat PD but also relieve pain in comparison with ibuprofen. Although GRADE evidence indicate low to moderate for most comparisons, mild moxibustion seems to be an advisable option for PD treatment to relieve symptoms.Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [a]Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510009, Guangdong [b]Guangdong Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou 510009, Guangdong, [d]Guangdong Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Research and Development, Guangzhou 510095, Guangdong, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [c]Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650500, [*1]Acupuncture Tuina and Rehabilitation Institute, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, 1076 Yuhua Road, Chenggong District, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号