机构:[1]Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China大德路总院妇科大德路总院妇科广东省中医院[2]Postdoctoral Research Station, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China[3]Department of Gynecology, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou, China大德路总院妇科大德路总院妇科广东省中医院
Objective: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used as first-line treatment of primary dysmenorrhea, but there has been no optimal clinical choice among non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs yet. The present study was to assess the relative benefits of different common non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for primary dysmenorrhea patients with a network meta-analysis. Methods: Randomized controlled trials were screened by our criteria and included in the network meta-analysis. Pain relief was considered as primary outcomes and adverse effect was supplied as a safety outcome, while additional rescue, assessment score, and pain intensity difference were secondary outcomes. All the indexes were evaluated with odds ratio or standardized mean difference. Surface under cumulative ranking curve result was used to calculate the ranking of each treatment. Results: Totally, 72 randomized controlled trials of 5723 patients and 13 drugs were included in our study after screening. As for pain relief, all drugs except nimesulide, rofecoxib, and waldecoxib were superior to aspirin (odds ratio with 95% credible intervals, diclofenac: 0.28 (0.08, 0.86), flurbiprofen: 0.10 (0.03, 0.29), ibuprofen: 0.32 (0.14, 0.73), indomethacin: 0.21 (0.07, 0.58), ketoprofen: 0.25 (0.10, 0.64), mefenamic acid: 0.28 (0.09, 0.87), naproxen: 0.31 (0.15, 0.64), piroxicam: 0.15 (0.03, 0.59), and tiaprofenic acid: 0.17 (0.04, 0.63)). Aspirin also required additional rescue when compared with the majority of other drugs (flurbiprofen: 3.46 (1.15, 11.25), ibuprofen: 6.30 (2.08, 20.09), mefenamic acid: 7.32 (1.51, 37.71), naproxen: 2.66 (1.17, 6.55), and tiaprofenic acid: 9.58 (1.43, 94.63)). As for assessment of the whole treatment, ketoprofen, naproxen, rofecoxib, and ibuprofen got higher score significantly than placebo. In addition, ibuprofen performed better than placebo in pain intensity difference. Considering the safety, tiaprofenic acid and mefenamic acid were noticeable in low risk, and indomethacin revealed higher risk than any other drugs. According to the results of network analysis and surface under cumulative ranking curve, flurbiprofen was considered to be the best one among all the treatments in efficacy, and aspirin was worse than most of others. On the other hand, tiaprofenic acid and mefenamic acid were indicated as the safest drugs. Conclusion: Considering the efficacy and safety, we recommended flurbiprofen and tiaprofenic acid as the optimal treatments for primary dysmenorrhea.
基金:
Lingnan traditional Chinese medicine gynecology treatment of menstruation and clinical study [2013B032500013]; State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine [16MLZY02]; National Famous Traditional Chinese Medicine Expert Inheritance Studio Construction Project-Wang Xiaoyun Chinese Medicine Office
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China[2]Postdoctoral Research Station, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China[*2]Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China[2]Postdoctoral Research Station, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China[3]Department of Gynecology, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou, China[*1]Department of Gynecology, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, No. 111 Dade Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.[*2]Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Feng Xuan,Wang Xiaoyun.Comparison of the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with primary dysmenorrhea: A network meta-analysis[J].MOLECULAR PAIN.2018,14:doi:10.1177/1744806918770320.
APA:
Feng, Xuan&Wang, Xiaoyun.(2018).Comparison of the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with primary dysmenorrhea: A network meta-analysis.MOLECULAR PAIN,14,
MLA:
Feng, Xuan,et al."Comparison of the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with primary dysmenorrhea: A network meta-analysis".MOLECULAR PAIN 14.(2018)