高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with primary dysmenorrhea: A network meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China [2]Postdoctoral Research Station, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China [3]Department of Gynecology, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Primary dysmenorrhea non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs efficacy safety network meta-analysis

摘要:
Objective: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used as first-line treatment of primary dysmenorrhea, but there has been no optimal clinical choice among non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs yet. The present study was to assess the relative benefits of different common non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for primary dysmenorrhea patients with a network meta-analysis. Methods: Randomized controlled trials were screened by our criteria and included in the network meta-analysis. Pain relief was considered as primary outcomes and adverse effect was supplied as a safety outcome, while additional rescue, assessment score, and pain intensity difference were secondary outcomes. All the indexes were evaluated with odds ratio or standardized mean difference. Surface under cumulative ranking curve result was used to calculate the ranking of each treatment. Results: Totally, 72 randomized controlled trials of 5723 patients and 13 drugs were included in our study after screening. As for pain relief, all drugs except nimesulide, rofecoxib, and waldecoxib were superior to aspirin (odds ratio with 95% credible intervals, diclofenac: 0.28 (0.08, 0.86), flurbiprofen: 0.10 (0.03, 0.29), ibuprofen: 0.32 (0.14, 0.73), indomethacin: 0.21 (0.07, 0.58), ketoprofen: 0.25 (0.10, 0.64), mefenamic acid: 0.28 (0.09, 0.87), naproxen: 0.31 (0.15, 0.64), piroxicam: 0.15 (0.03, 0.59), and tiaprofenic acid: 0.17 (0.04, 0.63)). Aspirin also required additional rescue when compared with the majority of other drugs (flurbiprofen: 3.46 (1.15, 11.25), ibuprofen: 6.30 (2.08, 20.09), mefenamic acid: 7.32 (1.51, 37.71), naproxen: 2.66 (1.17, 6.55), and tiaprofenic acid: 9.58 (1.43, 94.63)). As for assessment of the whole treatment, ketoprofen, naproxen, rofecoxib, and ibuprofen got higher score significantly than placebo. In addition, ibuprofen performed better than placebo in pain intensity difference. Considering the safety, tiaprofenic acid and mefenamic acid were noticeable in low risk, and indomethacin revealed higher risk than any other drugs. According to the results of network analysis and surface under cumulative ranking curve, flurbiprofen was considered to be the best one among all the treatments in efficacy, and aspirin was worse than most of others. On the other hand, tiaprofenic acid and mefenamic acid were indicated as the safest drugs. Conclusion: Considering the efficacy and safety, we recommended flurbiprofen and tiaprofenic acid as the optimal treatments for primary dysmenorrhea.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 神经科学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 神经科学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2016]版:
Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
最新[2023]版:
Q2 NEUROSCIENCES

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2016版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2015版] 出版后一年[2017版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China [2]Postdoctoral Research Station, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China [*2]Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China [2]Postdoctoral Research Station, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China [3]Department of Gynecology, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Guangzhou, China [*1]Department of Gynecology, Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, No. 111 Dade Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China. [*2]Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号