高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

The efficacy and safety of acupoint catgut embedding for peripheral facial paralysis sequela A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ 预警期刊

机构: [1]Clinical Medical School of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, [2]The Bao‘an District TCM Hospital, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: acupoint catgut embedding meta-analysis peripheral facial paralysis sequela protocol systematic review

摘要:
Background: Peripheral facial paralysis sequela (PFPS) is a group of sequence syndrome after the acute onset of peripheral facial paralysis. Nearly 70% of patients with peripheral facial paralysis recover completely, but nearly 30% of patients leave multiple sequelae, which have serious negative impacts on the physical and psychological health of patients. Without a high risk of side effect, acupoint catgut embedding (ACE), a common acupuncture therapy, is widely used to treat this disorder. And a number of studies have shown the efficacy of this therapy for PFPS. But in fact, the evidence of the overall effect of ACE in the treatment of PFPS is still insufficient. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ACE for PFPS. Methods: Two reviewers will collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ACE for PFPS by searching the following databases, including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, China Biomedical Literature (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and Wanfang database, from their initiation to May 2021. The searching of publications will include English and Chinese without any restriction of countries and regions. Besides, 2 reviewers will independently include in studies that meet the inclusion criteria and extract data we need, then use Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool to assess their methodological quality. The efficacy and safety of ACE as a treatment for PFPS will be assessed according to the synthetic risk ratio (RR), odds ratio (OR), or weighted mean difference (WMD), standardized mean difference (SMD) with consistent 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). And the Review Manager 5.3 software will be adopted to conduct the statistical analysis. Results: The protocol for meta-analysis will systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of ACE for PFPS. And the final result of this search will provide sufficient evidence and an authentic assessment focusing on the problem. Conclusion: This search will explore whether ACE could be used as an effective and non-drug external therapy of TCM for PFPS and offer supports for clinical practice. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021240004

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Clinical Medical School of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [2]The Bao‘an District TCM Hospital, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. [*1]Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The Bao‘an District TCM Hospital, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518101, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号