高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Effects of combination therapy with Shenfu Injection in critically ill patients with septic shock receiving mechanical ventilation: A multicentric, real-world study

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China, [2]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China, [3]Guangdong Provincial Branch of National Clinical Research Centre for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Guangzhou, China, [4]Medical Information Engineering, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: septic shock Shenfu injection combination therapy mechanical ventilation critically ill patients meta-analysis retrospective study

摘要:
Background: Septic shock has increasingly become a cause of death threatening human survival. Shenfu Injection (SFI), a patented Chinese medicine, has been widely used in the treatment of patients with sepsis and cardiovascular diseases domestically. We sought to examine whether combination therapy with SFI can improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: This real-world, multicenter retrospective trial enrolled consecutive adult patients with sepsis requiring MV from four medical/surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in China between August 2016 and September 2021. Patients were identified from the medical information department database of each center and assigned to either of two groups (SFI or control) on the basis of the initial treatment received. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, and the durations of vasopressor therapy and MV, the ICU length of stay, and costs were assessed as secondary outcomes. Subsequently, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SFI published before July 2021 to verify our conclusions. Results: 2311 mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock (1128 patients in the SFI group and 1183 in the control group) were analyzed. The survival probability during the first 28 days after admission in the SFI group was greater than that in the control group [p < 0.01 by log-rank test; hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.72]. Patients in the SFI group also experienced a significantly reduced duration of vasopressor therapy [7.28 (95% CI, 6.14-8.42) vs. 12.06 (95% CI, 10.71-13.41) days, p < 0.001], more ventilator-free days [6.49 (95% CI, 5.42-7.55) vs. 10.84 (95% CI, 9.59-12.09) days, p < 0.001], a shorter ICU length of stay [18.48 (95% CI, 17.59-19.38) vs. 23.77 (95% CI, 22.47-25.07) days, p < 0.001], and more time free from organ failure [14.23 (95% CI, 12.94-15.52) vs. 19.07 (95% CI, 16.09-22.05) days, p < 0.001]. No major adverse effects were reported in either group. Conclusion: Among critically ill patients requiring MV, combination therapy with SFI can improve the survival probability without any obvious adverse reactions.Copyright © 2022 Li, Huang, Zhu, Luo, Zhang, Gu, Guo and Mao.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 药学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 药学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China,
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China, [2]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China, [4]Medical Information Engineering, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号