高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Reporting quality and risk of bias assessment of animal research on Chaihu-Shugan-San for depression: A systematic review

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China. [2]Third-Grade Pharmacological Laboratory on Chinese Medicine Approved By State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China. [3]Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China. [4]Shenzhen Institute of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518035, China.
出处:

关键词: Chaihu Shugan San Depression Animal research ARRIVE guidelines SYRCLE risk of bias

摘要:
Chaihu-Shugan-San (CSS) is a traditional Chinese medicine formula employed to treat depression. We aim to conduct a reporting quality assessment and risk of bias evaluation of animal research on CSS for depression.To acquire eligible studies, two reviewers searched plentiful databases from inception to October 23rd, 2021. Reporting quality assessment and risk of bias assessment of the included animal studies were evaluated by using Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines and the SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk of bias tool, respectively.The initial search identified 720 records, while only 30 studies were included. The result of the reporting quality assessment was inferior, items 17 and 19 were not reported at all. The details of five items (items 3, 6, 7, 10, and 18) were not reported. The outcome of the risk of bias assessment suggested that half of the entries (5/10) displayed an unclear risk of bias and a high risk of bias. Blinding with regard to performance bias and detection bias revealed an unclear risk of bias (100%), followed by baseline characteristics (76.67%) and sequence generation (60%). Random outcome assessment showed a high risk of bias (100%).The included animal studies exhibited methodological defects and imprecise reporting. Hence, the ARRIVE guidelines and SYRCLE's RoB tool should be disseminated among basic medical researchers examining CSS for depression to publish studies with low risk of bias and sufficient reporting so that the animal research can promptly be transformed into clinical research.© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 4 区 综合性期刊
小类 | 4 区 综合性期刊
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 综合性期刊
小类 | 4 区 综合性期刊
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
最新[2023]版:
Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China. [2]Third-Grade Pharmacological Laboratory on Chinese Medicine Approved By State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号