Femoral neck fractures in young adults(<65 years), have always been a difficult problem, characterized by high rates of nonunion and avascular necrosis (AVN). The clinical efficacy of anatomical reduction and non-anatomical reduction methods needs to be supported by clinical data. Therefore, we conduct a meta-analysis on the clinical efficacy of different reduction methods to better guide clinical practice.Relevant studies published using internal fixation to treat femoral neck fracture in several databases were searched. The outcomes sought included Harris score and the rate of AVN, nonunion and femoral neck shortening (<5 mm). Included studies were assessed for methodological bias and estimates of effect were calculated. Potential reasons for heterogeneity were explored.The clinical results showed that compared with the anatomical reduction and positive buttress, there is no significant difference in the rate of AVN (OR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.55-1.37, P = .55), nonunion (OR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.21-1.41, P = .21), femoral neck shortening (<5 mm) (OR = 1.03,95%CI: 0.57-1.86, P = .92), the Harris score (MD = -0.28, 95%CI: -1.36-0.80, P = .61) and the excellent and good rate of Harris score (OR = 1.73, 95%CI: 0.84-3.56, P = .61). However, compared with negative buttress, the rate of AVN (OR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.38-1.01, P = .05), nonunion (OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.12-1.00, P = .05) and femoral neck shortening (<5 mm) (OR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.16-0.45, P < .00001) were significantly lower, and the Harris score (MD = 6.53, 95%CI: 2.55 ~ 10.51, P = .001) was significantly better in positive buttress.In the case of difficult to achieve anatomical reduction, for young patients (< 65 years) with femoral neck fracture, reduction with positive buttress can be an excellent alternative and negative buttress should be avoided as much as possible.Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.