高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Self-management interventions for chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ SSCI

机构: [1]The Second Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou, China [2]Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,USA [3]Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China [4]Nephrology Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of ChineseMedicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of ChineseMedicine, Guangzhou, China [5]Chronic Disease Management Department,Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second AffiliatedHospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No .111, Dade Rd,Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China [6]EBM & ClinicalResearch Service Group, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou, China [7]Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese MedicalSciences, Guangzhou, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Chronic kidney disease Self-management Chronic disease management

摘要:
BackgroundSelf-management intervention aims to facilitate an individual's ability to make lifestyle changes. The effectiveness of this intervention in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is limited. In this study, we applied a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether self-management intervention improves renoprotection for non-dialysis chronic kidney disease.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials addressing our objective. We searched for studies up to May 12, 2018. Two reviewers independently evaluated study quality and extracted characteristics and outcomes among patients with CKD within the intervention phase for each trial. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore heterogeneity.ResultsWe identified 19 studies with a total of 2540 CKD patients and a mean follow-up of 13.44months. Compared with usual care, self-management intervention did not show a significant difference for risk of all-cause mortality (5 studies, 1662 participants; RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.86; I-2=0%), risk of dialysis (5 studies, 1565 participants; RR 1.35; 95% CI 0.84 to 2.19; I-2=0%), or change in eGFR (8 studies, 1315 participants; SMD -0.01; 95% CI -0.23 to 0.21; I-2=64%). Moreover, self-management interventions were associated with a lower 24h urinary protein excretion (4 studies, 905 participants; MD -0.12g/24h; 95% CI -0.21 to -0.02; I-2=3%), a lower blood pressure level (SBP: 7 studies, 1201 participants; MD -5.68mmHg; 95%CI -9.68 to -1.67; I-2=60%; DBP: 7 studies, 1201 participants; MD -2.64mmHg, 95% CI -3.78 to -1.50; I-2=0%), a lower C-reactive Protein (CRP) level (3 studies, 123 participants; SMD -2.8; 95% CI -2.90 to -2.70; I-2=0%) and a longer distance on the 6-min walk (3 studies, 277 participants; SMD 0.70; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.94; I-2=0%) when compared with the control group.ConclusionsWe observed that self-management intervention was beneficial for urine protein decline, blood pressure level, exercise capacity and CRP level, compared with the standard treatment, during a follow-up of 13.44months in patients with CKD non-dialysis. However, it did not provide additional benefits for renal outcomes and all-cause mortality.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 泌尿学与肾脏学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 泌尿学与肾脏学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2017版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2016版] 出版后一年[2018版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]The Second Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou, China [2]Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,USA
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2022 今日访问量:0 总访问量:648 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号