高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

A comparison of genotyping tool in Treponema pallidum: Review and meta-analysis.

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Institute of Pathogenic Biology, Key Laboratory of Special Pathogen Prevention and Control of Hunan Province, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China [2]Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China [3]Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China [4]Clinical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China [5]Department of Medical Examination, Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, Hunan, China [6]The Hunan Province Innovative Training Base for Postgraduates, University of South China and Nanyue Biopharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Hengyang, Hunan, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Treponema pallidum Molecular typing Subtype Meta-analysis

摘要:
To decipher the molecular epidemiology of the Treponema pallidum subspecies, pallidum, researchers have developed different molecular typing schemes which identify strains type from clinical specimens. However, the results of these studies show remarkable diversity. We searched for literature in PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, and OVID from January 1998 to January 2019, in order to compare the efficiency of typing schemes using published evidence for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. From the 43 studies included, the overall typing efficiency of Treponema pallidum was 71.4% (95% CI: 63.2-78.9%). Subgroup analyses indicated that the typing efficiency of CDC-typing (CDCT, 68.2%, 95% CI: 53.6-81.2%) was worse than those of enhanced CDC-typing (ECDCT, 72.3%, 95% CI: 60-83.1%), CDC-rspA (81.6%, 95% CI: 76.1-86.6%), multi-locus sequence typing (MLST, 67.1%, 95% CI: 61.1-72.7), and sequencing-based molecular typing (SBMT, 71.6%, 95% CI: 50-89.2%). A limitation of this review is that the studies included employed different criteria to collect and investigate samples of Treponema pallidum, which could contribute to heterogeneity. This analysis suggests that CDCT is an inferior scheme in molecular typing, the discriminatory power was very similar for ECDCT and SBMT. Other factors contributing to the heterogeneity between typing studies warrants further study. Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 传染病学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 传染病学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Institute of Pathogenic Biology, Key Laboratory of Special Pathogen Prevention and Control of Hunan Province, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Institute of Pathogenic Biology, Key Laboratory of Special Pathogen Prevention and Control of Hunan Province, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China [*1]Institute of Pathogenic Biology, Key Laboratory of Special Pathogen Prevention and Control of Hunan Province, University of South China, 24 Changsheng Road, Hengyang 421001, Hunan, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2023 今日访问量:0 总访问量:648 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号