高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Evaluation of the Combination of Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessments to Interpret Malignant Architectural Distortion on Mammography

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Guangzhou, Peoples R China [2]Boston Meditech Grp, AI Res Lab, Burlington, MA 01803 USA [3]Shanghai Yanghe Huajian Artificial Intelligence T, AI Res Lab, Shanghai, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: artificial intelligence architectural distortion mammography breast cancer malignant

摘要:
PurposeTo compare the mammographic malignant architectural distortion (AD) detection performance of radiologists who read mammographic examinations unaided versus those who read these examinations with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Material and MethodsThis retrospective case-control study was based on a double-reading of clinical mammograms between January 2011 and December 2016 at a large tertiary academic medical center. The study included 177 malignant and 90 benign architectural distortion (AD) patients. The model was built based on the ResNeXt-50 network. Algorithms used deep learning convolutional neural networks, feature classifiers, image analysis algorithms to depict AD and output a score that translated to malignant. The accuracy for malignant AD detection was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC). ResultsThe overall AUC was 0.733 (95% CI, 0.673-0.792) for Reader First-1, 0.652 (95% CI, 0.586-0.717) for Reader First-2, and 0.655 (95% CI, 0.590-0.719) for Reader First-3. and the overall AUCs for Reader Second-1, 2, 3 were 0.875 (95% CI, 0.830-0.919), 0.882 (95% CI, 0.839-0.926), 0.884 (95% CI, 0.841-0.927),respectively. The AUCs for all the reader-second radiologists were significantly higher than those for all the reader-first radiologists (Reader First-1 vs. Reader Second-1, P= 0.004). The overall AUC was 0.792 (95% CI, 0.660-0.925) for AI algorithms. The combination assessment of AI algorithms and Reader First-1 achieved an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI, 0.793-0.968), increased than the Reader First-1 alone and AI algorithms alone. AI algorithms alone achieved a specificity of 61.1% and a sensitivity of 80.6%. The specificity for Reader First-1 was 55.5%, and the sensitivity was 86.1%. The results of the combined assessment of AI and Reader First-1 showed a specificity of 72.7% and sensitivity of 91.7%. The performance showed significant improvements compared with AI alone (p<0.001) as well as the reader first-1 alone (p=0.006). ConclusionWhile the single AI algorithm did not outperform radiologists, an ensemble of AI algorithms combined with junior radiologist assessments were found to improve the overall accuracy. This study underscores the potential of using machine learning methods to enhance mammography interpretation, especially in remote areas and primary hospitals.

语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 肿瘤学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q2 ONCOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 ONCOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2020 今日访问量:0 总访问量:646 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号