机构:[1]Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China. Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People’s Republic of China[2]Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China. Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People’s Republic of China[3]Department of Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Conde de S. Januario (CHCSJ), Macao, People’s Republic of China[4]Department of Ultrasonography, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, People’s Republic of China大德路总院影像科大德路总院超声影像科广东省中医院深圳市中医院深圳医学信息中心[5]Minimally Invasive Interventional Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China. Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People’s Republic of China
ObjectivesTo determine the methodology of non-invasive test for evaluation of liver stiffness (LS) with tumours using two-dimensional (2D) shear wave elastography (SWE).MethodsOne hundred and twenty-seven patients with liver tumours underwent 2D-SWE before surgery to measure liver and spleen stiffness (SS). Two-dimensional SWE values were obtained in the liver at 0-1 cm, 1-2 cm and >2 cm from the tumour edge (PLS-1, PLS-2 and RLS, respectively). The influence of tumour-associated factors was evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each value was analysed to diagnose cirrhosis.ResultsPLS-1 was higher than PLS-2, which was even higher than RLS (p < 0.001). The AUCs of PLS-1, PLS-2, RLS and SS for diagnosing cirrhosis were 0.760, 0.833, 0.940 and 0.676, with the specificity of 75.7%, 67.6%, 90.3% and 77.4%, respectively. Tumour sizes, locations or types showed no apparent influence on 2D-SWE values except for RLS, which was higher in patients with primary hepatic carcinomas (p < 0.05).ConclusionsLS with tumours is best measured at >2 cm away from the tumour edge. SS measurement could be used as an alternative to LS measurement in the event of no available liver for detection.Key Points center dot Tumour-associated factors impact background liver stiffness assessment.center dot Background liver stiffness is best measured at >2 cm from tumour edge.center dot Spleen stiffness can be an alternative to assess background liver stiffness.
第一作者机构:[1]Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China. Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People’s Republic of China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Zheng Wei,Zhou Zhong-guo,Wong Chong-hei,et al.Evaluation of liver parenchyma stiffness in patients with liver tumours: optimal strategy for shear wave elastography[J].EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY.2019,29(3):1479-1488.doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5676-8.
APA:
Zheng, Wei,Zhou, Zhong-guo,Wong, Chong-hei,Pei, Xiao-qing,Zhuang, Shu-lian...&Zhang, Fu-jun.(2019).Evaluation of liver parenchyma stiffness in patients with liver tumours: optimal strategy for shear wave elastography.EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY,29,(3)
MLA:
Zheng, Wei,et al."Evaluation of liver parenchyma stiffness in patients with liver tumours: optimal strategy for shear wave elastography".EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY 29..3(2019):1479-1488