高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Evaluation of liver parenchyma stiffness in patients with liver tumours: optimal strategy for shear wave elastography

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China. Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People’s Republic of China [2]Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China. Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People’s Republic of China [3]Department of Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Conde de S. Januario (CHCSJ), Macao, People’s Republic of China [4]Department of Ultrasonography, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, People’s Republic of China [5]Minimally Invasive Interventional Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China. Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People’s Republic of China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Elasticity imaging techniques Ultrasonography Liver neoplasms Liver cirrhosis Spleen

摘要:
ObjectivesTo determine the methodology of non-invasive test for evaluation of liver stiffness (LS) with tumours using two-dimensional (2D) shear wave elastography (SWE).MethodsOne hundred and twenty-seven patients with liver tumours underwent 2D-SWE before surgery to measure liver and spleen stiffness (SS). Two-dimensional SWE values were obtained in the liver at 0-1 cm, 1-2 cm and >2 cm from the tumour edge (PLS-1, PLS-2 and RLS, respectively). The influence of tumour-associated factors was evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each value was analysed to diagnose cirrhosis.ResultsPLS-1 was higher than PLS-2, which was even higher than RLS (p < 0.001). The AUCs of PLS-1, PLS-2, RLS and SS for diagnosing cirrhosis were 0.760, 0.833, 0.940 and 0.676, with the specificity of 75.7%, 67.6%, 90.3% and 77.4%, respectively. Tumour sizes, locations or types showed no apparent influence on 2D-SWE values except for RLS, which was higher in patients with primary hepatic carcinomas (p < 0.05).ConclusionsLS with tumours is best measured at >2 cm away from the tumour edge. SS measurement could be used as an alternative to LS measurement in the event of no available liver for detection.Key Points center dot Tumour-associated factors impact background liver stiffness assessment.center dot Background liver stiffness is best measured at >2 cm from tumour edge.center dot Spleen stiffness can be an alternative to assess background liver stiffness.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 核医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 核医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
最新[2023]版:
Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2017版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2016版] 出版后一年[2018版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China. Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People’s Republic of China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号