高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

The efficacy and safety of knotless barbed sutures in total joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China [2]Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China [3]Bone and Joint Research Team of Degeneration and Injury, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510120, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Knotless barbed sutures Total joint arthroplasties Knotted traditional sutures Randomized control trials meta-analysis

摘要:
The knotless barbed sutures (KBS) are an innovative type of suture that can accelerate the placement of sutures and eliminate knot tying. Whether the KBS are safe and efficient in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety. Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to October 2017. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess methodological quality. The statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3.5 software. A total of five RCTs (600 participants) were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that KBS reduced wound suture time (MD - 4.51, 95% CI - 5.37 to - 3.66, P < 0.00001) and the wound suture cost (MD - 282.63, 95% CI - 445.32 to - 119.95, P < 0.00001), and did not significantly increase the rate of complications (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.42-1.39, P = 0.13) or intraoperative events (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.04-17.28, P = 0.92). There were no significant differences in ROM at postoperative 6 weeks and 3 months (MD - 0.74, 95% CI - 4.19 to 2.71, P = 0.67; MD - 0.30, 95% CI - 2.62 to 2.02, P = 0.80; respectively). Our findings suggest that KBS are a safe and effective method for TJA. Given the possible biases, adequately powered and better designed studies with longer follow-up are required to reach a firmer conclusion.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 骨科 4 区 外科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 骨科 3 区 外科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2016]版:
Q2 SURGERY Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
最新[2023]版:
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Q2 SURGERY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2016版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2015版] 出版后一年[2017版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Second School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China [3]Bone and Joint Research Team of Degeneration and Injury, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510120, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [2]Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China [3]Bone and Joint Research Team of Degeneration and Injury, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510120, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Meta-analysis Comparing Platelet-Rich Plasma vs Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis [2]IS TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE A GOOD OPTION IN METHOTREXATE-BASED COMBINATION THERAPIES IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND BAYESIAN NETWORK META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS [3]Comparison of platelet-rich plasma vs hyaluronic acid injections in patients with knee osteoarthritis A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis [4]参芪扶正注射液治疗慢性心力衰竭随机对照试验的Meta分析 [5]Comparison of kidney-tonifying and blood-activating medicinal herbs vs NSAIDs in patients with knee osteoarthritis A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis [6]Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [7]Do disease status and race affect the efficacy of zoledronic acid in patients with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials [8]全髋及全膝关节置换后假体周围感染抗生素应用方案研究进展 [9]Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: A PRISMA-compliant updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials. [10]Is the combined application of both drain-clamping and tranexamic acid superior to the single use of either application in patients with total-knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号