高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Effect of gefitinib plus Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective case control study

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No 36,Huadi Yong’An Street, Liwan District, Guangzhou 510120, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Non-small-cell lung cancer Gefitinib Chinese herbal medicine Case control analysis

摘要:
Background: Some patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) respond well to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) was effective in improving the quality of life and prolonging overall survival in patient with NSCLC. We aim to determine whether gefitinib plus CHM could prolong the progression-free survival (PFS) or median survival time (MST) in patients with NSCLC than gefitinib alone. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 159 non-small-cell lung cancer patients with the method of retrospective case control study, matching factors included gender, age categories (30-39,40-49,50-59,60-69,70-79), pathological stage (IIIB or IV), smoking status (never: <100 lifetime cigarettes, or ever: >= 100 lifetime cigarettes), pathology, and performance status. Among the 159 patients, 100 patients treated with gefitinib (250 mg/day orally) plus CHM ("Fuzheng Kang'ai" decoction, a Chinese herbal medicine, 250 ml/bid/day orally), 59 patients treated with gefitinib (250 mg/day orally) only. PFS and MST were analyzed for the whole population. Results: 58 pairs were matched successfully. 1 patient (treated with gefitinib) with the age of 27 years failed to be matched. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients treated with gefitinib plus CHM than with gefitinib: median PFS was 13.1 months (95% Cl 6.50-19.70) with gefitinib plus CHM versus 11.43 months (95% Cl 7.95-14.91) with gefitinib (log-rank P=0.013). Median overall survival was longer with gefitinib plus CHM than with gefltinib: median MST was 22.83 months (95% Cl 17.51-28.16) with gefitinib plus CHM versus 18.7 months (95% Cl 16.83-20.57) with gefitinib (log-rank P=0049). The most common adverse event was rash, the incidence in the gefitinib plus CHM group was 41.38% while in the gefitinib group was 24.14% (P=0.048). Conclusions: This case-control analysis suggested that treatment with gefitinib plus CHM prolonged PFS and MST compared with gefitinib in patients with NSCLC, and it is worthy of further study. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2013]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 全科医学与补充医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 全科医学与补充医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2012]版:
Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
最新[2023]版:
Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2012版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2011版] 出版后一年[2013版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No 36,Huadi Yong’An Street, Liwan District, Guangzhou 510120, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号