高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Comparison of bracketing calibration and classical calibration curve quantification methods in establishing a candidate reference measurement procedure for human serum 17β-estradiol by isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, PR China [2]Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, PR China [3]Department of Pharmacy and Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Pharmacodynamic Constituents of Traditional Chinese Medicine & New Drug Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, PR China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: 17 beta-Estradiol Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Clinical serum Reference measurement procedure

摘要:
A highly accurate liquid chromatography tandam mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based candidate reference measurement procedure (cRMP) for the determination of human serum 17 beta-estradiol (E-2) was developed. A bracketing calibration method (BCM) based on internal standard (IS) concentrations for each sample used to best match the analyte concentration was compared to the classical calibration curve-based method with a constant IS concentration. Precision was analyzed according to the inter-assay reproducibility (n = 15) and intra-assay repeatability (n = 9). Accuracy was confirmed using certified reference materials (CRMs) and further validated by comparison to the established RMPs. Sixty patient serum samples were collected, and the E-2 levels were measured by the BCM isotope dilution (ID) procedure coupled with the LC-MS/MS method to evaluate three immunoassays commonly used in clinical laboratories in China. Limits of quantification (LoQ) as low as 5 pg/mL (18 pmol/L) were achieved. The isomer of E2 (17 alpha-estradiol) was successfully separated by optimizing the LC method. The results of method validation showed that the intra- and inter-assay imprecisions were 1.84 similar to 2.91% vs 2.08 similar to 9.53%, while the analytical recoveries were 98.73 similar to 100.77% vs 93.72 similar to 102.39% for the BCM and classical calibration curve quantification method, and the BCM demonstrated a higher agreement with CRMs and established RMPs. Bland-Altman plots of the E, results revealed concentration-dependent biases. In conclusion, a precise, facile, and reliable ID-LC-MS/MS method is developed in this study. It is demonstrated that the use of the BCM could achieve higher precision and accuracy, which better meet the needs of RMPs.

基金:

基金编号: 81572088 2018A0303130124 YN2016QJ15 YN2019QL01 YN2019MJ04 2017KQNCX033 201704020213

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 3 区 化学
小类 | 3 区 分析化学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 化学
小类 | 2 区 分析化学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
最新[2023]版:
Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, PR China [2]Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, PR China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:2018 今日访问量:0 总访问量:645 更新日期:2024-07-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 广东省中医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:广州市越秀区大德路111号